Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Oct 23.
Published in final edited form as: Arch Surg. 2008 May;143(5):476–481. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.143.5.476

Table 2.

Low- vs High-Impact Fistulas in Patients Who Underwent Pancreaticoduodenectomy

No. (%)

Characteristic Low-Impact
Fistula
(n = 29)
High-Impact
Fistula
(n = 46)
P
Value
Age, mean (SD), y 62 (11.1) 63 (15.4) .47
Length of stay, mean (SD), d 10.3 (5.5) 32 (21.4) <.001
Length of operation, mean (SD), min 353.0 (92.0) 392.3 (132.1) .21
Discharged with drain 23 (79.3) 23 (50.0) .02
JP drain output on postoperative day 7, mean (SD), mL 114.1 (116.0) 229.4 (223.2) .01
Use of antibiotics 8 (27.6) 39 (84.8) <.001
Use of octreotide 4 (13.8) 32 (69.6) <.001
Use of TPN 1 (3.5) 30 (65.2) <.001
Duration of fistula, mean (SD), d 17.8 (6.3) 35.4 (17.5) <.001
Associated abscess or collection NA 36 (78.3) <.001
Need for IR drainage NA 28 (60.9) <.001
Delayed gastric emptying NA 7 (15.2) .04
Need for reoperation NA 5 (10.9) .15
Bleeding NA 9 (19.6) .01
Mortality
  30-Day or in-hospital NA 5 (10.9) .15
  Fistula-related NA 7 (15.2) .04

Abbreviations: IR, interventional radiology; JP, Jackson-Pratt; NA, not applicable (by definition, low-impact fistulas do not result in these complications); TPN, total parenteral nutrition.