Table 1: Measures of Continuity of Care.
Name of Index | Description | Score Range | Index Measures | Strengths | Weaknesses | |||
Durationa | Densityb | Dispersionc | Sequenced | |||||
Usual Provider of Continuity (UPC) index | The number of visits to a usual provider in a given period over the total number of visits to similar providers | 0 to 1 | Yes | Yes | No | No | Since a ‘usual provider’ is defined, it may be useful in analyzing the role of other health providers in addition to physicians | Only assesses visits with usual provider, other providers not included in the index Not independent of utilization levels Measure decreases as number of visits increases |
Continuity of Care (COC) index | Measures both the dispersion and concentration of care among all providers seen | 0 to 1 | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Sensitive to shifts in the distribution of visits among providers Good mathematical performance; tends to have a mean of 0.5 and a large coefficient of variation |
May mask important differences in sequencing of care Mot independent of utilization levels Measure decreases as number of visits increases Measure falls rapidly with increasing number of providers seen |
Modified Continuity Index (MCI) | Measure of concentration of care in population of patients calculated by dividing the average number of visits by a group by the average number of providers in the a population | 0 to 1 | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Requires summary utilization measures only (compared with COC which requires more utilization data) | Extremes of continuity not reflected in measure (i.e., 2 visits to same provider yields an intermediate result rather than perfect continuity) |
Modified Modified Continuity Index (MMCI) | Measure of concentration of care with providers at the individual patient level Developed to account for problems of COC and MCI indices |
0 to 1 | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Requires summary utilization measures only (compared with COC which requires more utilization data) Not overly sensitive to large number of providers |
No sequential data captured |
Sequential Continuity (SECON) index | Fraction of sequential visit pairs where the same provider is seen | 0 to 1 | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Sensitive to shifts in sequence of visits Potentially useful as measure of amount of inter-provider communication necessary because of transfers of care |
Insensitive to the distribution of visits among providers if sequencing remains constant |
Duration refers to the length of time with a particular provider.
Density refers to the number of visits with the same provider over a defined time period.
Dispersion refers to the number of visits with distinct providers.
Sequence refers to the order in which different providers are seen.
Source: Reid et al, 2002. (3)