Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cytokine. 2013 Aug 26;64(2):10.1016/j.cyto.2013.08.001. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2013.08.001

Fig. 5. T cell quiescence is maintained in IgHKOIL6Tg mice.

Fig. 5

(A) Surface CD69 and CD25 expression on IgHKO and IgHKOIL6Tg T cells. Histograms are representative of three independent analyses with each one mouse.

(B) Activated/memory phenotype cells percentages in CD4 and CD8 LN T cells. Contour plots of surface CD62L and CD122 versus CD44 expression are representative of three independent analyses with each one mouse.

(C) Ki-67 intra-nuclear staining of CD4 LN T cells from IgHKO and IgHKOIL6Tg mice. Histogram is representative of and bar graph shows the mean +/− SEM from three independent experiments with each one mouse.

(D) BrdU incorporation in DN thmocytes and LN T cells from IgHKO and IgHKOIL6Tg mice. After initial i.p. injection with BrdU, mice were supplied with BrdU in drinking water for 3 days. BrdU incorporation was assessed by anti-BrdU intracellular staining. Bar graph shows the mean +/− SEM for the indicated cells from two independent experiments with two IgHKO and five IgHKOIL6Tg mice.

(E) FoxP3+ and Helios+ CD4 T cells in IgHKO and IgHKOIL6Tg mice. Contour plots are representative of three independent analyses with each one mouse.

(F) FoxP3+CD25+ CD4 Treg cell percentages in IgHKO and IgHKOIL6Tg LN cells. Data show the mean +/− SEM percentages of FoxP3+CD25+ cells among CD4 LN T cells from three independent experiments.