Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 May 3.
Published in final edited form as: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2013 Apr 3;52(19):5046–5051. doi: 10.1002/anie.201301018

Table 1.

Screening of representative catalyst types.[a]

graphic file with name nihms520656t1.jpg

Entry R Ligand Conv. [%][b] d.r.[b] Yield [%][c]
1 H (1a) 6 47 92:8 36
2 H (1a) 7 58 94:6 41
3 H (1a) rac-binap >98 95:5 80
4 Me (2a) 6 >98 91:9 76
5 Me (2a) 7 >98 93:7 83
6 Me (2a) rac-binap >98 94:6 85
[a]

Performed under N2 atm.

[b]

Determined by analysis of 400 MHz 1H NMR spectra of unpurified mixtures (±2%).

[c]

Yields of isolated and purified products (±5%; major isomer for entries 1–3 and both isomers for entries 4–6). See the Supporting Information (SI) for details.

graphic file with name nihms520656f8.jpg