Table 3.
Injury | Assay | References |
---|---|---|
Cryoinjury of the right ventricle | Increased healing vs. C57BL/6; | (Leferovich et al., 2001) |
60 days post injury | ||
>Reduced hydroxyproline | ||
>Increased mitosis | ||
>Increased function by echo | ||
Cryoinjury of the right ventricle | Increased healing vs. C57BL/6; | (Bedelbaeva et al., 2004) |
> MT | ||
> less collagen | ||
Permanent occlusion | No control strain | (Oh et al., 2004) |
27 and 104 days post-surgery | ||
>MRI demonstrated transmural infarction with fibrosis | ||
> MT demonstrated fibrosis | ||
Transient 45′ IR | No difference vs. C57BL/6; | (Abdullah et al., 2005) |
24 hours and 10 weeks post injury | ||
>Calculated infarct area with TTC and MT staining | ||
Cryoinjury, superficial | Increased healing vs. C57BL/6; | (Naseem et al., 2007) |
Restoration of cardiac function in MRL hearts | ||
Less collagen deposition | ||
Cryoinjury, severe | Increased survival | |
Reduced scarring | ||
Decreased apoptosis | ||
Decreased ventricular remodeling | ||
Not complete regeneration | ||
Transmural myocardial injury, severe | Increased survival | |
Increased cellular proliferation | ||
Reduced scarring | ||
Decreased ventricular remodeling | ||
Not complete regeneration | ||
Permanent occlusion | No difference vs. C57BL/6; | (Robey and Murry, 2008) |
1 – 90 days post injury | ||
>Calculated infarct area with H&E and Sirius red staining | ||
>Mitosis | ||
Cryoinjury | No difference vs. C57BL/6; | |
7 and 28 days post injury | ||
>H&E and Sirius red staining | ||
>Mitosis | ||
Permanent occlusion | No difference vs. C57BL/6; | (Grisel et al., 2008) |
60 days post injury | ||
>Calculated infarct area with H&E and Sirius red staining | ||
>Mitosis | ||
Cryoinjury | No difference vs. C57BL/6; | |
60 days post injury | ||
>H&E and Sirius red staining | ||
>Mitosis | ||
Permanent occlusion | No difference vs. C57BL/6; | (Cimini et al., 2008) |
0, 5, 15, 60 days post injury | ||
>Heart function by echo and Millar catheter | ||
> MT, H&E | ||
> Mitosis | ||
Permanent occlusion | No difference vs. C57BL/6; | (Moseley et al., 2011) |
4 weeks post injury | ||
>Calculated infarct area with MT staining | ||
>Heart function; contractility, pressure and volume | ||
Muscular dystrophy | Reduced fibrosis and reduced functional decline vs. DBA/2J; | Heydemann manuscript in preparation |
>Hydroxyproline | ||
>Echocardiography |
TTC-(2,3,5)-triphenyltetrazolium: MT- Masson’s trichrome; H&E- hematoxylin and eosin staining; IR- ischemia reperfusion injury