Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Oct 23.
Published in final edited form as: IEEE Trans Circuits Syst I Regul Pap. 2013 Jan 9;60(6):1407–1418. doi: 10.1109/TCSI.2012.2220464

TABLE II.

Performance Comparison of ADCs Recently Reported for Sensory Applications

Year 2012 2008 2011 2006 2010
Integrated Circuit Technology 0.5µm CMOS 90nm CMOS 0.18µm CMOS not fully integrated 0.6µm CMOS simulation 0.13µm CMOS
Power Supply 3.3V IV 0.7V 5V 1.2V
ADC Area 0.06mm2 0.06mm2 0.96mm2 N/A 0.17mm2
ADC Method Fixed Window Asynchronous Floating Window Asynchronous Floating Window Asynchronous Integration Asynchronous SAR ADC Clocked
Input Signal Bandwidth 0.2–5kHz 0.2–3.4kHz (Audio) 1kHz (full scale) 5.4kHz N/A
Measured SNDR 31dB 50 dB 43.2 dB N/A 39.32dB
Power Consumption 8.25µW (Static)
106µW (1kHz Input)
45µW
(ADC only)
25µW
w/o off chip logic
100 µW simulation 1µW
Conversion Rate (per second) 60k 512ka 50k 10k
Figure of Merit (l/nj · mm2) 662bc 1,048,646c 601bcd N/A 5379e
Reference This Work [39] [23] [15] [9]
a

Level crossing sampling with 8bit resolution for 1kHz input signal

b

Using off-line reconstruction

c

SNDR is set to 1kHz input signal

d

Digital logic feedback not integrated on chip

e

Using clocked ADC, no data compression