Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep 22;112(7):1461–1469. doi: 10.1093/aob/mct213

Table 1.

Study pairs and floral features

Region Family Pair Taxa Code Range Sites Symmetry Colour Nectar Mating Ovules
Andalusia Cistaceae 1 Fumana baetica Fub E 2 Actino Yellow No SC 9
Andalusia Cistaceae 1 Helianthemum appeninum appeninum Hcr NE 2 Actino Yellow No SI 16·7 ± 1·3
Andalusia Cistaceae 2 F. paradoxa Fup E 1 Actino Yellow No SC 6
Andalusia Cistaceae 2 H. cinereum Hci NE 1 Actino Yellow No SC 6
Andalusia Caryophyllaceae 3 Silene psammitis lasiostyla Spl E 2 Actino Pink Yes SC 33·3 ± 0·9
Andalusia Caryophyllaceae 3 S. colorata Sco NE 2 Actino Pink Yes SC 53·8 ± 2·2
Andalusia Lamiaceae 4 Thymus orospedanus Tho E 2 Zygo Pink Yes SC 4
Andalusia Lamiaceae 4 Sideritis incana Sii E 1 Zygo Yellow Yes SC 4
Andalusia Lamiaceae 4* Teucrium polium Tpo NE 2 Zygo Beige Yes SC 4
California Liliaceae 5 Triteleia peduncularis Trp E 5 Actino White Yes SI 27·7 ± 0·8
California Liliaceae 5 Zigadenus venenosus Ziv NE 5 Actino Beige Yes SI 20·4 ± 0·4
California Ranunculaceae 6 Delphinium uliginosum Deu E 5 Zygo Purple Yes SC 31·4 ± 1·5
California Scrophulariaceae 6 Antirrhinum cornutum Anc NE 5 Zygo Purple Yes SI 62·3 ± 3·6
California Phyrmaceae 7 Mimulus nudatus Min E 5 Zygo Yellow No SC 179·2 ± 14·9
California Phyrmaceae 7 M. guttatus Mig NE 5 Zygo Yellow No SC 240·9 ± 28·3
Yucatan Malvaceae 8 Cienfuegosia yucatanensis Cie E 2 Actino Yellow Yes SC 16·4 ± 0·4
Yucatan Malvaceae 8 Sida acuta Sid NE 2 Actino Yellow Yes SC 5·9 ± 0·1
Yucatan Lythraceae 9 Cuphea gaumeri Cup E 1 Zygo Purple Yes SC 25·6 ± 1·6
Yucatan Scrophulariaceae 9 Angelonia angustifolia Ang NE 1 Zygo Purple Yes SC 53·5 ± 0·7
Yucatan Lythraceae 10 C. gaumeri Cup E 1 Zygo Purple Yes SC 25·8 ± 1·0
Yucatan Verbenaceae 10 Tamonea curassavica Tam NE 1 Zygo Purple Yes SC 4

Taxa were categorized according to distribution range, distinguishing between endemics (E) and non-endemics (NE); floral symmetry, distinguishing between actinomorphic (Actino) and zygomorphic (Zygo); presence of nectar as a reward; and mating system, distinguishing between self-incompatible (SI) and self-compatible (SC) plants. The number of ovules was constant in some taxa; for those that were variable, we show an average (± s.e.) obtained from a small independent sample (8 ≤ n ≤ 20). The number of sites where samples were collected is also indicated.

*Teucrium polium was compared against two endemic species, although one of them was only collected in a study site in which the three coexist.

Cuphea gaumeri only coexists with each paired species within a single study population; thus, population data were not merged.