Table 2.
(Left ventricle) Average similarity measure with the correlation, Jaccard and Dice indices, Hausdorff distance, and the maximum cardinality similarity metric among the regions segmented by the Graph Cut method, traditional ACM, interactive Tseng method, our proposed method, and the regions outlined by experts of the MR dataset.
| Comparative | Similarity measure | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Studies | (C) | (J) | (D) | (H) | (MCSM) |
| Graph Cut versus experts | 0.7169 | 0.4893 | 0.6571 | 12.623 | 0.556 |
| ACM versus experts | 0.8608 | 0.5909 | 0.7428 | 9.501 | 0.637 |
| Tseng versus experts | 0.8688 | 0.7500 | 0.8571 | 7.284 | 0.0.695 |
| Our method versus experts | 0.8866 | 0.8421 | 0.9142 | 6.476 | 0.711 |