Skip to main content
. 2012 Jan 27;11:5. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-11-5

Table 2.

Overview of epidemiological studies on methyl bromide effects (1990-2011)

Reference Study design Magnitude of study Specified measure 1 Exposure to methyl bromide cases p value high vs. low
study year sample size location cancer (prostate) Odds Ratio adjusted 95% CI

[28] 2003 cohort study occupational agriculture, farmers 55, 332 USA, IA, NC exposed/controls *84/482 84 1.10 0.77, 1.36 0.004

low exposure 6 2.73 1.18, 6.33

high exposure 5 3.47 1.37, 8.76

[29] 2010 data analysis occupational agriculture, farmers 55, 332 USA, IA, NC 5 3.47 1.37, 8.76 0.004

[30] 2003 case-control study occupational agriculture, Hispanic farm workers 1, 332 USA, CA exposed/controls 121/1110 64 1.17 0.77, 1.75 0.25

low exposure 37 1.20 0.66, 2.18

high exposure 32 1.59 0.77, 3.30

[31] 2011 case-control study population, near intensive agricult. areas USA, CA exposed/controls 173/162 87 1.62 1.02, 2.59 0.1

low exposure 45 1.81 1.03, 3.18

high exposure 42 1.45 0.82, 2.57

[29] 2010 data analysis occupational agriculture, farmers 55, 332 USA, IA, NC 5 3.47 1.37, 8.76 0.004

toxic effects

[32] 2006 cohort study population, farmers' wives USA, CA exposed/controls *145/797 1.82 1.02-3.24