Skip to main content
Therapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease logoLink to Therapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease
. 2013 Nov;4(6):302–304. doi: 10.1177/2040622313494987

Argatroban in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: rationale for use and place in therapy

Ramandeep K Bambrah 1,, Dat C Pham 2, Fauzia Rana 3
PMCID: PMC3807762  PMID: 24179672

Abstract

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a recognized complication of heparin and requires urgent detection and treatment. HIT can be divided into two types, type I and type II, with type I being a transient decrease in platelet count without clinical consequence. For the purpose of this review, the term HIT refers to the immune-mediated type II that causes paradoxical thrombo-emboli. The aim of this review is to familiarize clinicians with a specific direct thrombin inhibitor, argatroban, in the treatment of HIT. Argatroban has been successfully employed in treating HIT in many different subsets of patients, including those with endstage renal disease on hemodialysis and in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and those with multiorgan dysfunction syndrome.

Keywords: argatroban, heparin, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Introduction

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is suspected when the platelet count decreases more than 50% or decreases to < 150 × 109/l, most commonly 5–10 days after the initiation of heparin [Martel et al. 2005]. HIT type II is the immune-mediated type and is crucial to recognize due to the known complication of life-threatening venous and arterial thrombo-emboli [Evan Sadler and Mortimer, 2010]. The first step in treating HIT is discontinuing all heparin products, including removal of heparin-coated central lines if present. HIT leads to a hypercoagulable state and paradoxical thrombus formation; therefore alternate anticoagulation is essential to decrease this risk. Without alternate anticoagulation, the risk of thromboembolic complications can be seen in 30–75% of cases [Saugel et al. 2010]. The life-threatening complications of HIT include deep vein thrombosis (DVT), myocardial infarction, cerebral sinus thrombus, pulmonary embolus, stroke, adrenal vein thrombosis, limb gangrene and acute limb ischemia. Several direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) have been studied in the management of HIT, including lepirudin, bivalirudin and argatroban. This review focuses on the use of argatroban in treating HIT.

Pathophysiology of HIT

HIT can develop in up to 3% of patients treated with unfractionated heparin (UFH) [Girolami et al. 2002]. It is an immune-mediated phenomenon caused by heparin-dependent platelet activating immunoglobulin G (IgG) that is triggered by antibodies formed between heparin and platelet factor 4 (PF4) [Kelton et al. 1994]. This forms an immune complex consisting of a heparin/PF4 core and is the target antigen for the antibody. These immune complexes develop onto platelet surfaces, thus allowing the Fc receptor region on IgG to activate platelets [Kelton et al. 1994] and eventually leading to platelet aggregation, causing thrombocytopenia. Activation of platelets also leads to release of PF4 from granules that are located within the platelets and this in turn results in a vast generation of thrombin, leading to a prothrombotic state [Thachil, 2010]. HIT can be diagnosed via various assays that have been developed, namely the serotonin release assay that detects the specific antibody. There are also PF4-dependent antigen assays that detect IgG/A/M HIT antibodies and, when combined with clinical features, are very sensitive [Legnani et al. 2010].

Argatroban

Argatroban is a small molecule DTI that acts by reversibly binding to the catalytic thrombin active site, thus inhibiting activation of factors V, VIII and XIII (the coagulant factors), as well as preventing fibrin formation and platelet aggregation [Hursting et al. 1997]. It is eliminated via the hepatobiliary system; therefore precaution is needed in patients with hepatic impairment due to decreased clearance. It is not absolutely contraindicated but dose adjustment is recommended. It is given via the intravenous (IV) route and usual initial dosing is 2 µg/kg/min continuous IV infusion adjusted to steady-state activated partial thromboplastin (aPTT) 1.5–3 times initial baseline value but cannot surpass 100 seconds. No initial bolus is needed and lower doses can be used in patients with multiorgan failure or severe anasarca at 0.5–1.2 µg/kg/min [Warkentin et al. 2008]. Maximum dose is 10 µg/kg/min [Micromedex 2.0]. The half-life of argatroban is 39–51 minutes and adverse effects that are common for all DTIs include bleeding and hypotension [Warkentin et al. 2008]. Argatroban has specific molecular properties that allow this agent to have less risk of systemic anticoagulant effects. It is a small molecule with a shorter half-life compared with lepirudin or fondaparinux and has selective reversible binding to the thrombin catalytic site [Hursting et al. 1997]. Given these properties, argatroban offers the capacity to have a substantial anticoagulant effect with fewer chances of systemic toxicity and adverse events.

Argatroban in HIT

Argatroban has been effectively utilized in critically ill intensive care unit patients with multiorgan dysfunction diagnosed with HIT [Saugel et al. 2010]. This agent has been approved for both HIT prevention and treatment; it does increase the international normalized ratio (INR) when overlapping it with warfarin for anticoagulation and therefore the therapeutic INR range may need to be increased [Warkentin et al. 2008]. Due to the fact that it is eliminated via the liver, it is commonly used in patients undergoing renal replacement therapy (RRT). A retrospective study was recently done comparing the three DTIs approved for HIT management in patients receiving RRT, comparing primary endpoints of thrombosis, hemorrhage and in-hospital mortality. There was no statistically significant difference in rates of hemorrhage or mortality when comparing lepirudin, argatroban and bivalirudin [Abel et al. 2012]. Argatroban is an accepted and effective treatment of HIT in patients receiving RRT.

Argatroban has also been successfully employed in patients with HIT undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Anticoagulation in patients with HIT having PCI is critical and was examined in this specific subset of patients by Lewis and colleagues. Argatroban was safely used with acceptable outcomes post-PCI and provided sufficient anticoagulation [Lewis et al. 2002].

With regard to dosing of argatroban, the reported maximum dose is 10 µg/kg/min. A case report has described using high-dose argatroban for treatment of HIT with thrombosis, with initial dose starting at 2 µg/kg/min and target aPTT of 40–80 seconds. This patient had continued worsening of swelling at the site of thrombosis, and therefore the goal aPTT was increased eventually to >75 seconds and the infusion rate was increased to 15.5 µg/kg/min [Hellwig et al. 2012]. Higher doses of argatroban can be considered in patients with HIT plus thrombosis which is not responding to initial doses of infusion and may need the goal aPTT increased. This patient did not have significant adverse events but this is hard to predict with such high doses. Optimally, it would be beneficial if laboratories were able to measure actual argatroban concentration in patient’s serum but this is not currently available. High doses of argatroban are an option, if needed, with close in-hospital monitoring.

Argatroban can also be considered in patients with hepatic dysfunction even though it is cleared by the hepatobiliary system. In these instances, aPTT needs to be monitored closely and frequently, and dose reduction is required. Initial dose recommendation in hepatic impairment is 2 µg/kg/min [Hursting and Murray, 2008] and some patients may even require lower doses, especially those considered to be high risk, i.e. postcardiac surgery or severe anasarca [Hursting and Murray, 2008]. Argatroban dose can be successfully reduced to 0.5 µg/kg/min in a patient with moderate liver disease without major bleeding risks, although dosing has not been specifically examined in patients with severe liver disease [Yarbrough et al. 2012]. Although argatroban is eliminated via the hepatobiliary route, it can still be considered in patients with mild-to-moderate liver dysfunction who have been diagnosed with HIT. Anticoagulant values return to baseline value usually within 2–4 hours of stopping argatroban but may take longer in patient with impaired hepatic function [Hursting and Murray, 2008].

Critically ill patients with multiple organ dysfunction syndrome as well as patients undergoing PCI can be successfully anticoagulated with argatroban, but due to their critical illness, initial dose reduction is needed [Saugel et al. 2010]. One of the additional benefits of argatroban is that no initial bolus is required, thus facilitating ease of administration. Argatroban is rapidly acting and has been shown to significantly reduce the risk of death or new thrombosis [Lewis et al. 2001]. Treatment of HIT with argatroban successfully lowers mortality rates from thrombosis without increased bleeding risk [Lewis et al. 2001].

Given this information, argatroban is a DTI that clinicians need to be aware of and this agent can be effectively utilized in treating HIT with monitoring of the aPTT.

Footnotes

Funding: This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest in preparing this article.

Contributor Information

Ramandeep K. Bambrah, Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine Jacksonville, Medical Oncology Fellow, PGY-4, 655 West 8th Street, Pavilion 4 North, Box P-18, Jacksonville, FL 32209, USA

Dat C. Pham, Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA

Fauzia Rana, Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA.

References

  1. Abel E., Kane-Gill S., Seybert A., Kellum J. (2012) Direct thrombin inhibitors for management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in patients receiving renal replacement therapy: Comparison of clinical outcomes. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 69: 1559–1567 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Evan Sadler J., Mortimer P. (2010) Antibody-mediated thrombotic disorders: thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. In: Lichtman M., Kipps T, Seligsohn U., Kaushansky K., Prchal J. (eds), Williams Hematology, 8e, Part XII: Hemostasis and Thrombosis, 8th ed. McGraw-Hill, London and New York, Chapter 133. [Google Scholar]
  3. Girolami B., Prandoni P., Stefani P., Tanduo C., Sabbion P., Eichler P., et al. (2002) The incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in hospitalized medical patients treated with subcutaneous unfractionated heparin: a prospective cohort study. Blood 101: 2955–2959 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hellwig T., Peitz G., Gulseth M. (2012) High-dose argatroban for treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with thrombosis: a case report and review of laboratory considerations. Am J Health Syst Pharm 69: 490–495 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hursting M., Alford K., Becker J., Brooks R., Joffrion J., Knappenberger G., et al. (1997) Novastan (brand of argatroban): a small-molecule, direct thrombin inhibitor. Semin Thromb Hemost 23: 503–516 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hursting M., Murray P. (2008) Argatroban anticoagulation in renal dysfunction: a literature analysis. Nephron Clin Pract 109: c80–94 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kelton J., Smith J., Warkentin T., Hayward C., Denomme G., Horsewood P. (1994) Immunoglobulin G from patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia binds to a complex of heparin and platelet factor 4. Blood 83: 3232–3239 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Legnani C., Cini M., Pili C., Boggian O., Frascaro M., Palareti G. (2010) Evaluation of a new automated panel of assays for the detection of anti-PF4/heparin antibodies in patients suspected of having heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Thromb Haemost 104: 402–409 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lewis B., Mathhai W., Jr, Cohen M., Moses J., Hursting M., Leya F. (2002) Argatroban anticoagulation during percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Catheter Cardiovasc Interventions 57: 177–184 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lewis B., Wallis D., Berkowitz S., Matthai W., Fareed J., Walenga J., et al. (2001) ARG-911 Study Investigators. Argatroban anticoagulant therapy in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Circulation 103: 1838–1843 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Martel N., Lee J., Wells P. (2005) Risk for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with unfractionated and low-molecular-weight heparin thromboprophylaxis: a meta-analysis. Blood 106: 2710–2715 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Saugel B., Phillip V., Moessmer G., Schmid R., Huber W. (2010) Argatroban therapy for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in ICU patients with multiple organ dysfunction syndrome: a retrospective study. Crit Care 14: R90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Thachil J. (2010) The prothrombotic potential of platelet factor 4. Eur J Intern. Med, 21: 79–83 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Warkentin T., Greinacher A., Koster A., Lincoff A. (2008) Treatment and prevention of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th edition) Chest 133: 340S–380S [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Yarbrough P., Varedi A., Walker A., Rondina M. (2012) Argatroban dose reductions for suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia complicated by child-pugh class C liver disease. Ann Pharmacother 46: e30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Therapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES