Skip to main content
. 2013 Oct;18(4):215–223. doi: 10.1177/1355819613493772

Table 3.

Depression prevalence by deprivation quintile at different levels of morbidity. Figures are frequencies except where indicated. Data for 2007 to 2011.

Number of conditions Deprivation quintile Person years Depressed (%)a Relative rate (95% CI)b
None Least deprived 59,268 3803 (6.4) Reference
 2 50,644 3683 (7.3) 1.14 (1.09 to 1.19)
 3 54,857 4225 (7.7) 1.21 (1.15 to 1.26)
 4 47,065 4202 (8.9) 1.41 (1.35 to 1.47)
Most deprived 51,566 5741 (11.1) 1.76 (1.69 to 1.83)
Single Conditions Least deprived 8531 639 (7.5) 1.34 (1.23 to 1.46)
 2 8365 754 (9.0) 1.62 (1.49 to 1.75)
 3 9588 910 (9.5) 1.70 (1.58 to 1.82)
 4 8660 922 (10.6) 1.86 (1.73 to 2.00)
Most deprived 10,643 1459 (13.7) 2.33 (2.19 to 2.48)
Dual conditions Least deprived 1324 88 (6.7) 1.34 (1.08 to 1.65)
 2 1411 152 (10.8) 2.09 (1.78 to 1.46)
 3 1660 183 (11.0) 2.15 (1.85 to 2.49)
 4 1607 195 (12.1) 2.30 (1.99 to 2.66)
Most deprived 2190 310 (14.2) 2.56 (2.28 to 2.88)
Triple conditions Least deprived 106 9 (8.3) 1.86 (0.96 to 3.60)
 2 126 13 (10.4) 1.94 (1.13 to 3.34)
 3 153 12 (8.1) 1.61 (0.92 to 2.82)
 4 138 24 (17.4) 3.29 (2.20 to 4.92)
Most deprived 230 31 (13.5) 2.48 (1.74 to 3.54)
a

Bracketed percent represents the prevalence of depression in each category.

b

Relative rates indicate the excess risk associated with deprivation and existing morbidity level, compared with healthy participants in the least deprived quintile for reference, adjusted for age group and gender.