Skip to main content
. 2012 Apr 24;53(4):2199–2207. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-8639

Table 1.

Results of the Multivariable Model Investigating the Relationship between Rates of Visual Field Loss and Putative Predictive Factors for Progression

Predictive Factor
Coefficient
Estimate
95% CI
P
Mean IOP* γ1 −0.028 −0.045 to −0.011 <0.001
(Mean IOP)2 γ2 −0.0035 −0.005 to −0.002 <0.001
CCT,† per 100 μm γ3 0.21 0.04 to 0.38 0.015
Optic disc progression‡ γ4 −0.35 −0.51 to −0.19 <0.001
Optic disc progression × follow-up time§ γ5 0.083 0.029 to 0.136 0.003
Constant γ0 0.08 −0.001 to 0.162 0.054

CI, confidence interval.

*

IOP values were centered on their mean value in the population (19 mm Hg).

CCT measurements were centered on their mean value in the population (543 μm).

Optic disc progression was a categorical variable with value 1 if there was evidence of optic disc progression on stereophotographs and zero otherwise.

§

Follow-up time corresponds to the follow-up until first detection of optic disc progression.