Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Trop Med Int Health. 2013 Sep;18(9):10.1111/tmi.12155. doi: 10.1111/tmi.12155

Table 2.

Mutually adjusted effects* of age, educational attainment, and wealth on testing compared with not testing, among men and women (adjusted prevalence ratios, confidence intervals (C.I.) and p-values)

Adj. Prev. Ratios, Women Adj. Prev. Ratios, Men
Age (years)
1824 - reference
 25–34 1.25 (1.1, 1.41) 1.29 (0.96, 1.74)
p=0.001 p=0.091
 35–44 1.2 (1.07, 1.35) 1.63 (1.15, 2.3)
p=0.003 p=0.006
 45+ 0.94 (0.76, 1.16) 1.57 (1.08, 2.27)
p=0.55 p=0.018
Educational Attainment
No formal education - reference
 Primary complete 1.11 (1, 1.24) 1.09 (0.84, 1.4)
p=0.061 p=0.53
 Secondary or more 1.16 (0.99, 1.37) 1.29 (0.97, 1.73)
p=0.073 p=0.083
Household assets index (quartiles)
Poorest - reference
 Poorer 1.05 (0.95, 1.16) 1.03 (0.8, 1.33)
p=0.35 p=0.81
 Wealthier 1.03 (0.87, 1.22) 1.08 (0.81, 1.44)
p=0.77 p=0.60
 Wealthiest 1 (0.84, 1.19) 1.19 (0.91, 1.55)
p=0.92 p=0.90
N 1784 1341
*

Results also adjusted for country (fixed effect, not shown) and for clustering at the interview facility level using a GEE.

**

Reference: no formal education

***

Reference: lowest