Table-II.
Study ID | County | Control source | Case | Control |
Cases
|
Controls
|
P HWE | Quality score | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CC | CT | TT | CC | CT | TT | |||||||
Chen Y 2009 (16) | China | Hospital | 103 | 181 | 11 | 49 | 43 | 45 | 85 | 51 | 0.42 | 10 |
Feng CW 2006 (17) | China | Population | 275 | 315 | 51 | 105 | 119 | 74 | 143 | 98 | 0.12 | 8 |
Zhao PC 2011 (18) | China | Hospital | 155 | 310 | 68 | 74 | 13 | 179 | 120 | 11 | 0.09 | 9 |
Li DQ 2011 (19) | China | Hospital | 226 | 246 | 112 | 113 | 45 | 95 | 82 | 85 | <0.1 | 9 |
Li DQ 2008 (20) | China | Population | 126 | 169 | 22 | 52 | 52 | 41 | 62 | 66 | <0.1 | 10 |
Wang YM 2007(21) | China | Population | 584 | 540 | 73 | 263 | 248 | 119 | 234 | 187 | <0.1 | 11 |
Qin JM 2008 (22) | China | Population | 120 | 204 | 60 | 53 | 7 | 170 | 59 | 11 | 0.06 | 11 |
He YT 2007 (23) | China | Population | 584 | 540 | 73 | 263 | 248 | 119 | 234 | 187 | <0.1 | 10 |
Song C 2001 (9) | China | Population | 240 | 360 | 29 | 118 | 93 | 126 | 172 | 62 | 0.8 | 11 |
Wang LD 2005 (24) | China | Population | 275 | 315 | 51 | 105 | 119 | 74 | 143 | 98 | 0.12 | 10 |
Yang CX 2005 (12) | Japan | Hospital | 165 | 493 | 63 | 82 | 20 | 186 | 227 | 80 | 0.45 | 9 |
Zhang J 2004 (25) | German | Population | 241 | 256 | 94 | 116 | 31 | 107 | 115 | 34 | 0.72 | 10 |
Zhang J 2004 (25) | China | Population | 189 | 141 | 16 | 93 | 80 | 25 | 54 | 62 | <0.1 | 10 |
Kureshi N 2004 (26) | Pakistan | Population | 34 | 54 | 22 | 12 | 0 | 32 | 18 | 4 | 0.52 | 8 |
Zhang JH 2003(27) | China | Population | 198 | 141 | 16 | 93 | 89 | 25 | 54 | 62 | <0.1 | 7 |
Stolzenberg RZ 2003 (11) | China | Population | 129 | 398 | 23 | 58 | 48 | 65 | 209 | 124 | 0.14 | 8 |
Miao XP 2002 (28) | China | Population | 217 | 468 | 47 | 107 | 63 | 151 | 217 | 100 | 0.18 | 12 |
Umar M 2010 (29) | India | Hospital | 208 | 223 | 155 | 48 | 5 | 155 | 63 | 5 | 0.63 | 13 |
Total | 4239 | 5576 | 1008 | 1856 | 1375 | 1829 | 2353 | 1393 | ||||
Results of meta-analysis (Random effect model), OR(95% CI) | CT vs CC | 1.47(1.32-1.63), P for heterogeneity: <0.05 | ||||||||||
TT vs CC | 1.69(1.49-1.91), P for heterogeneity: <0.05 |