Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Oct 28.
Published in final edited form as: J Youth Adolesc. 2009 Sep 22;39(3):10.1007/s10964-009-9452-6. doi: 10.1007/s10964-009-9452-6

Table 4.

Summary of the logistic regression analyses examining negative self-views and cognitive errors as moderators of the relationship between assault history and NSSI

Predictor variables B SE OR 95% CI Wald p value
View of self
Step 1 Gender 1.60 .35 4.96 2.51–9.81 21.20 .00**
Step 2 Internalizing 0.78 .36 2.18 1.07–4.42 04.68 .03*
Step 3
 Assault −0.09 .45 0.91 0.38–2.21 00.04 .84
 View of self −0.18 .04 0.84 0.78–0.91 20.18 .00**
Step 4 Assault × View of self −0.37 .19 0.69 0.48–0.99 04.02 .05*
Cognitive errors
Step 1 Gender 1.57 .35 4.81 2.43–9.54 20.27 .00**
Step 2 Internalizing 0.80 .36 2.22 1.09–4.49 04.88 .03*
Step 3
 Assault 0.21 .42 1.24 0.54–2.82 00.26 .61
 Cognitive errors 0.02 .01 1.02 1.00–1.04 05.14 .02*
Step 4 Assault × Cognitive errors 0.08 .04 1.09 1.01–1.17 05.05 .03*

B unstandardized beta, SE standard error at entry, OR odds ratio, Internalizing internalizing disorders

*

p < .05,

**

p <.01