Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Obstet Gynecol. 2013 May;121(5):10.1097/AOG.0b013e31828e89df. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31828e89df

Table 2.

Cumulative Incidence of a Subsequent Oophorectomy Among the Hysterectomy Cases, Separately by Level of Ovarian Preservation

Ovarian Preservation at the Time of Hysterectomy Number of Patients With Subsequent Oophorectomy Cumulative Incidence of Subsequent Oophorectomy by Years After the Index Date, %*
2 5 10 15 20 25 30
One ovary intact (n=1,015) 34 1.2 1.7 2.8 3.2 4.0 4.0 4.0
Both ovaries intact (n=3,916) 281 0.7 1.9 3.7 5.3 6.8 8.8 10.6
*

The cumulative incidence of a subsequent oophorectomy is significantly different between the 2 groups (hazard ratio, 2.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.51–3.07; P<.001; based on a Cox model fit on an age scale).