Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Urol. 2013 May 18;190(5):10.1016/j.juro.2013.05.036. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.05.036

Appendix Table 2.

Characteristics of the cohort by surgical approach


MIRP ORP

No. % No. % p-value
Total N 3,199 32% 6,795 68%
Age at diagnosis <0.0001
 66–69 1,797 56% 3,689 54%
 70–74 1,129 35% 2,351 35%
 75–59 249 8% 598 9%
 80+ 24 1% 157 2%
Race <0.0001
 White 2,767 86% 5,913 87%
 Black 165 5% 455 7%
 Other 267 8% 427 6%
Census tract median income <0.0001
 1st quartile 611 19% 1,844 27%
 2nd quartile 682 21% 1,775 26%
 3rd quartile 839 26% 1,617 24%
 4th quartile 1,028 32% 1,430 21%
 Unknown 39 1% 129 2%
Urban-rural residence <0.0001
 Metropolitan 2,884 90% 5,673 83%
 Non-metropolitan 315 10% 1,122 17%
Region <0.0001
 Northeast 517 16% 828 12%
 South 582 18% 1,041 15%
 Midwest 366 11% 821 12%
 West 1,834 57% 4,105 60%
Marital status <0.0001
 Married 2,564 80% 5,465 80%
 Not married 430 13% 1,029 15%
 Unknown 205 6% 301 4%
Clinical T-stage <0.0001
 T1 1,857 58% 3,042 45%
 T2 1,264 40% 3,313 49%
 T3/T4 54 2% 155 2%
 Unknown 24 1% 285 4%
Gleason score <0.0001
 2–6 1,160 36% 3,012 44%
 7+ 2,024 63% 3,733 55%
 Unknown 15 0% 50 1%
Lymph node involvement <0.0001
 Negative 3,092 97% 6,524 96%
 Positive 30 1% 189 3%
 Unknown 77 2% 82 1%
Androgen deprivation therapy <0.0001
 Yes 393 12% 1,044 15%
 No 2,806 88% 5,751 85%
Charlson comorbidity score 0.0002
 0 2,575 80% 5,219 77%
 1 466 15% 1,169 17%
 2+ 158 5% 407 6%
Previous hernia 0.7101
 Yes 191 6% 393 6%
 No 3,008 94% 6,402 94%
Surgery year <0.0001
 2003 112 4% 1,320 19%
 2004 333 10% 1,563 23%
 2005 517 16% 1,332 20%
 2006 791 25% 1,206 18%
 2007 1,176 37% 1,189 17%
 2008 270 8% 185 3%

MIRP: Minimally invasive radical prostatectomy

ORP: Open radical prostatectomy