Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Sex Transm Dis. 2013 Feb;40(2):10.1097/OLQ.0b013e31827938a1. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e31827938a1

TABLE 2.

Unprotected Sex Measured at Follow-up Visit by Counseling Arm for Intent-to-Treat Population (N = 286)

Abstinence + Condom
Abstinence Only
Risk Difference (95% CI) Relative Risk (95% CI)
No. % No. %
Primary analysis
 Positive for PSA
  Yes 17 11.9 12 8.4 3.5% (−3.5%–10.5%) 1.42 (0.70–2.86)
  No 126 88.1 131 91.6
Secondary analyses
 High positive for PSA
  Yes 11 7.7 8 5.6 2.1% (−3.7%, 7.9%) 1.38 (0.57–3.32)
  No 132 92.3 135 94.4
 Reported unprotected sex since enrollment visit
  Yes 25 17.9 16 11.7 6.2% (−2.1%, 14.5%) 1.53 (0.85–2.74)
  No 115 82.1 121 88.3
 Reported unprotected sex in 2 d before follow-up visit
  Yes 8 5.6 7 4.9 0.7% (−4.4%, 5.9%) 1.15 (0.43–3.09)
  No 134 94.4 136 95.1
 No. of unprotected acts reported in 2 d before follow-up visit Median, 0; range, 0–2 Median, 0; range, 0–3