. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Aug 28.

Published in final edited form as: ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2013 Aug 5;5(16):10.1021/am402044s. doi: 10.1021/am402044s

Table 1.

Conductivity of initial polymer solution and resulting fiber diameter as a function of dopant type.^a

Nitric oxide donor	Type of dopant	Particle size (nm)	Conductivity (μS cm⁻¹)	Fiber diameter (nm)
None			0.9 ± 0.3	558 ± 162
Control particle	AEAP3/TMOS		9.4 ± 2.2	491 ± 155
N-diazeniumdiolate	AEAP3/TMOS	152 ± 2	44.3 ± 8.2	462 ±109
	AHAP3/TEOS	56 ± 7	49.0 ± 7.5	387 ± 163
	AHAP3/TEOS	93 ± 14	48.4 ± 3.6	514 ± 190
S-nitrosothiol	MPTMS/TEOS	416 ± 23	1.8 ± 0.9	573 ± 211

5 wt% particle-doped 12% (w/v) Tecoflex polyurethane electrospun fiber