Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Oct 29.
Published in final edited form as: J Autoimmun. 2011 Nov 6;37(4):10.1016/j.jaut.2011.10.001. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2011.10.001

Antigen-specific prevention of type 1 diabetes in NOD mice is ameliorated by OX40 agonist treatment

Damien Bresson a, Georgia Fousteri a,b,1, Yulia Manenkova a, Michael Croft b, Matthias von Herrath a,*
PMCID: PMC3811160  NIHMSID: NIHMS333968  PMID: 22063316

Abstract

Antigen-specific therapies are possibly the safest approach to prevent type 1 diabetes (T1D). However their clinical translation has yielded poor results and greater efforts need to be put into the development of novel strategies to ameliorate their clinical outcome. OX40 is a costimulatory molecule expressed by T cells after antigen recognition and has been implicated in the control effector but also regulatory T cells (Tregs) function in vivo. The activity of OX40 signal on Tregs function has been controversial. In this context we investigated whether an anti-OX40 agonist antibody treatment can ameliorate antigen-specific immune intervention for the prevention of T1D. We show that treatment of non-obese diabetic (NOD) mice with an OX40 agonistic antibody (OX86) reduced type 1 diabetes (T1D) incidence by inducing both CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ Tregs and CD4+Foxp3 T cells expressing the latency-associated peptide (LAP). These OX86-induced CD4+Foxp3LAP+ T cells also demonstrated suppressive activity in vitro. A significant increase in protection was observed when OX86 was combined with insulin B9:23 (insB9:23) peptide immunizations. Synergy resulted from an expansion of IL-10-expressing insB9:23-reactive Tregs which augmented the proportion of CD4+ T cells with in vivo suppressive activity. Consequently, CD4+ T cells purified from OX86/insB9:23 combination treatment prevented T1D development when adoptively transferred into recipient mice. These findings suggest that the requirement for OX40 signaling by antigen-induced Tregs can be dominant over its well-documented need for effector memory cell function and may have potentially important implications for improving the clinical translation of antigen-specific prevention of T1D and possibly other autoimmune disorders.

Keywords: Type 1 diabetes (T1D), Immunotherapy, Tolerance, Regulatory T cells (Tregs), OX40, Insulin B9-23 peptide

1. Introduction

Autoimmune diabetes, also known as juvenile or type 1 diabetes (T1D), results from the destruction of insulin-producing pancreatic beta-cells by auto-reactive immune cells. Despite the improvements in our understanding of the physiopathology of the disease, the incidence of T1D has been continuously rising over the past years, especially in young children [1,2]. The development of immune interventions for the treatment of T1D has been the focus of intense research over the past decades but still remains to be improved [3,4]. Ultimately a safe and potent approach to prevent the destruction of pancreatic beta-cells before the clinical symptoms of overt T1D (i.e. hyperglycemia) will be highly desirable.

One of the most attractive approach to prevent T1D is the deployment of islet (auto)antigen (aAg)-specific regulatory T cells (Tregs) [5], These cells can be induced through a plethora of immunization methods using aAg-expressing DNA vaccines [6], peptides derived from islet antigens [7] or with full-length islet proteins [8]. When administered in a tolerogenic fashion during the prediabetic phase in animal models, these vaccines mediate protection by expending islet-specific CD4+ Tregs. Mechanistically, there is a growing body of evidence suggesting that islet-specific Tregs operate in vivo by migrating and selectively proliferating in the pancreatic lymph nodes (PLN) where islet antigens are presented to the immune system during diabetes development [9,10]. When activated at the right time (early in diabetes development) and at the right place (in the pancreatic lymph nodes), Tregs can suppress expansion and activation of polyclonal autoaggressive T cells located in their vicinity thanks to a mechanism called bystander suppression and most likely via modulation of antigen-presenting cells [11]. The appealing aspect about this type of intervention is the generation of islet aAg-specific Tregs that will locally and permanently dampen multiple autoaggressive effector T cells, then circumventing the need to identify all aAg targets and avoiding systemic side-effects.

So far, the clinical outcomes of islet aAg-specific vaccination for the prevention [12] or the reversion [13,14] of human autoimmune diabetes have been disappointing probably because treatment efficacy has been hindered by a weak in vivo expansion of aAg-specific Tregs [15]. Therefore, an improvement of this procedure is mandatory to reach clinical efficacy and might require the use of in silico modeling to optimize different immunization parameters (such as the impact of dose, frequency of administration and age at treatment) [16], but maybe also a combination with other immune interventions which will support the expansion of aAg-specific Tregs in vivo [4,17],

OX40 (CD134, TNFRSF4) is a member of the TNF receptor superfamily expressed on a variety of immune cells including activated T cells, NKT cells, NK cells and neutrophils [18]. Naturally occurring CD4+ Tregs (nTregs) constitutively express OX40 in mice, while human nTregs up-regulate OX40 on their surface upon TCR cross-linking. Conflicting data from the literature have raised the issue that OX40 agonist signals might transiently inhibit nTreg suppressive function [1923], but also at the same time, or under particular inflammatory conditions, promote nTreg persistence and survival [24]. Similar to data with nTregs, both in vitro and in vivo studies on antigen-specific adaptive (aTregs) led to contrasting results [20,21,2529] revealing that OX40 signaling has a more complex physiology on Tregs than previously thought.

In this context we decided to evaluate whether OX40 agonist treatment would be beneficial to increase the anti-diabetogenic potential of aAg-specific aTregs in vivo. Here, we show that treatment with a non-depleting anti-OX40 agonist antibody can control T1D in non-obese diabetic (NOD) mice by expanding simultaneously CD4+Foxp3+ and CD4+Foxp3LAP+ Tregs. We also show that anti-OX40 can synergize with insulin B9:23 (insB9:23) peptide immunotherapy to expand in vivo IL-10-secreting insB9:23-specific aTregs. This study points for the first time towards a therapeutic utility of OX40 agonist signal in conjunction with antigen-specific induction of aTregs to protect from T1D.

2. Results

2.1. Antigen-specific prevention of type 1 diabetes in NOD mice is ameliorated in presence of OX40 agonist antibody

To evaluate the ability of the non-depleting anti-OX40 agonist antibody (OX86) to affect Treg function in an autoimmune environment we treated non-obese diabetic (NOD) mice early during type 1 diabetes (T1D) pathogenesis and followed disease development. T1D was significantly delayed and the incidence was reduced after anti-OX40 treatment (31% protection versus 12% for the control group at 30 weeks post-treatment; p = 0.0275) (Fig. 1A). Since nasal insulin therapy did not significantly delay T1D in humans [30,31], in order to mimic this situation in NOD mice we employed a sub-optimal vaccination schedule consisting of high-frequency nasal insB9:23 peptide immunizations as we previously described [16]. At this dose intranasal insB9:23 peptide mono-therapy did not significantly delayed T1D (Fig. 1A) although a lower incidence was observed at 30 weeks post-treatment as compared to the control group (33% versus 12% protection). Efficacy of both mono-therapies and in particular insB9:23 peptide therapy was significantly augmented when combined with OX40 agonist antibody (Fig. 1A) leading to 54% protection (B9:23 alone versus B9:23+OX86; p = 0.0139 and OX86 versus B9:23+OX86; p = 0.036).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Antigen-specific prevention of T1D is augmented by using an agonistic OX40-specific antibody. (A) Six-week old female NOD mice were immunized intranasally with the insulin B-chain 9-23 (B:9-23) peptide (n = 12 mice). Two groups of mice were treated intraperitoneally with the anti-OX40 agonistic mAb OX86 (days 1, 3 and 5; 200 μg/injection) alone (group OX86; n = 16 mice) or in conjunction with B:9-23 peptide (group B:9-23 + OX86; n = 15 mice). In the control group, B:9-23 and OX86 treatments were substituted for PBS and isotype control treatments respectively (n = 12 mice). NS, not significant (B) Seven-week old NOD females were treated with anti-OX40 agonistic mAb (OX86). Two weeks later pancreas-infiltrating leukocytes were purified and the percentage of IFNγ- and TNF-expressing CD4+ and CD8+ T cells infiltrated in the pancreas was enumerated by intracellular cytokine staining after in vitro stimulation with PMA (25 ng/ml) and Ionomycin (500 ng/ml) (two independent experiments; n = 8 mice per group). **, p < 0.01 as compared to non-treated mice.

The efficacy of OX40 agonist therapy was accompanied by a reduction of potentially pathogenic intra-pancreatic T cells secreting pro-inflammatory cytokines. As observed Fig. 1B, the frequency of TNF-secreting CD4+ T cells was significantly diminished in the pancreas of treated NOD mice (19.49 ± 4.18% versus 9.27 ± 5.58% for controls, **p < 0.01). Collectively these data suggest that antigen-specific therapy of prediabetic NOD mice is ameliorated in presence of OX40 agonist signal.

2.2. OX40 agonist stimulation in combination with antigen-specific therapy prevents type 1 diabetes in NOD mice by expanding Tregs

To determine whether efficacy of anti-OX40 and insB9:23 treatments were associated with an expansion of Tregs, we first enumerated CD4+CTLA-4+Foxp3+ Tregs in the spleen and pancreatic lymph nodes (PLN) two weeks after treatment. The percentage of Tregs was augmented in the PLN after both anti-OX40 and insB9:23 mono-therapies as compared to control NOD mice receiving an isotype antibody and intranasal PBS1X immunization (Fig. 2A and B). Synergy between OX40 agonist stimulation (OX86) and insB9:23 peptide immunization correlated with an additional expansion of CD4+CTLA-4+Foxp3+ Tregs in the PLN after anti-OX40/insB9:23 combination treatment and correlates with the improvement of efficacy seen Fig. 1A.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Anti-OX40 treatment in prediabetic NOD mice expands CD4+CTLA4+Foxp3+ regulatory T cells. (A–B) Six-week old female NOD mice were immunized intranasally with the insulin B-chain 9-23 (InsB:9-23) peptide or with PBS alone as control. During the first week of treatment, some mice received three injections of anti-OX40 agonistic (OX86) or isotype control antibody (on days 1, 3 and 5; 200 μg/injection). Two weeks later the percentage of CD4+CTLA-4+Foxp3+ regulatory T cells (Tregs) was measured in the spleens and pancreatic lymph nodes (PLN). *, p < 0.05 and **, p < 0.01 as compared to control mice. Two independent experiments (5 pooled mice/experiment).

Expansion of de novo Tregs upon anti-OX40 agonist antibody (OX86) treatment in prediabetic NOD mice was observed in the spleen and PLN (Fig. 3A), as well as in the pancreas (data not shown), and subsequently confirmed by an increase in the number of CD4+Foxp3+ Tregs expressing the proliferation marker Ki67 (Fig. 3B). A higher percentage of Tregs stained positive for Ki67 after OX86 than isotype control treatment in the spleen (50.58 ± 3.21% vs 35.05 ± 3.21%, **p < 0.01) and pancreatic lymph nodes (42.9 ± 3.4% vs 33.05 ± 5.46%, *p < 0.05) but not in the blood (54.65 ± 4.38% vs 60.87 ± 4.02%). Only a small increase in CD4+Foxp3Ki67+ cells was observed in each group, presumably as a result of homeostatic proliferation of CD4+ effector T cells (Teffs) (Fig. 3B).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

OX86 treatment induces CD4+Foxp3+ Tregs proliferation in prediabetic NOD mice. (A) Six-week old NOD mice were treated with OX86 or an isotype control antibody (days 1, 3 and 5; 200 μg/injection). Day 7 post-treatment the percentage of CD4+Foxp3+ Tregs was calculated in the spleen, pancreatic lymph nodes (PLN) and blood of each individual mouse (n = 5 mice per group). (B) Representative histograms showing the Ki67 profiles of spleen-, PLN- and blood-derived CD4+Foxp3+ and CD4+Foxp3T cells from OX86 or isotype treatment groups (percentages of CD4+Foxp3+Ki67+ cells are shown). NS; not significant (p > 0.05).

2.3. OX40 agonistic antibody treatment expands LAP-expressing CD4+ Tregs in the pancreas of NOD mice

Previous studies have identified TGFβ-dependent Tregs characterized by surface expression of latency-associated peptide (LAP; [32]). We next determined whether OX40 agonist antibody treatment promotes the generation of CD4+LAP+ T cells. The percentage of total CD4+LAP+ T cells induced upon OX40 agonist treatment gradually expanded (10% expansion two weeks post-treatment) in the pancreas of treated NOD mice (Fig. 4A). The expansion seen in the spleen and PLN at 1 week after OX40 agonist therapy (~6%) was not sustained at 2 weeks. In addition to anti-OX40 therapy, insB9-23 peptide immunization given alone also significantly expanded the percentage of CD4+LAP+ T cells in the pancreas of treated NOD mice (Fig. 4B). However, the percentage of total CD4+LAP+ T cells was not affected after anti-OX40 (OX86)/insB9-23 combination treatment (CT) as compared to the control group. This observation can be explained by the fact that the percentage of CD4+Foxp3+LAP Tregs parallely increased in the CT group (Fig. 5A). Consequently, the percentage of LAP+ T cells remained constant within the CD4+ population. We next assessed whether anti-OX40 and insB9-23 therapies given alone or in combination expanded insB9-23-reactive CD4+LAP+ T cells. As depicted Fig. 4C and D, both mono-therapies significantly expanded insB9-23-reactive CD4+LAP+ T cells in the pancreas when insB9-23 peptide stimulation was used as compared to unstimulated cells (OX86: 57.1 ± 2.6% vs 51.4 ± 3.4%, *p = 0.019 and insB9-23: 62.0 ± 1.4% vs 55.2 ± 3.1%, **p = 0.0079. Although the percentage of total CD4+LAP+ T cells diminished upon CT in the pancreas (Fig. 4D) the percentage of insB9-23-specific CD4+LAP+ T cells was significantly augmented when compared to unstimulated cells (OX86/insB9-23: 52.6 ± 2.3% vs 44.4 ± 3.1%, *p = 0.008).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

OX40 agonist antibody treatment in prediabetic NOD mice augments the proportion of CD4+LAP+ T cells. (A) The expansion of CD4+LAP+ T cells in the spleen, pancreatic lymph nodes (LN) and pancreas was evaluated at 1 and 2 weeks post-treatment with OX40 agonist Ab (200 μg on days 1, 3 and 5). (B–D) Six-week old female NOD mice were immunized intranasally with the insulin B-chain 9-23 (InsB:9-23) peptide or with PBS alone as control (n = 5 mice per group). During the first week of treatment, some mice received three injections of anti-OX40 agonistic (OX86) or isotype control antibody (on days 1, 3 and 5; 200 μg/injection). Two weeks later the percentage of CD4+LAP+ T cells was measured in the spleen, PLN and pancreas of treated NOD mice with or without prior in vitro stimulation with insB9-23 peptide. The data were reproduced in two independent experiments with 4–5 mice/group. *, p < 0.05 and **, p < 0.01.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

OX40 agonist treatment increases the number of both CD4+CD25+Foxp3+CTLA4+LAP+ and CD4+Foxp3LAP+ T cells. (A) Six-week old NOD mice were treated with (i) OX40 agonist antibody (OX86), (ii) insulin B(9-23) peptide or (iii) both in combination. Control mice received a combination of intranasal PBS and isotype antibody control. Day 10 post-treatment the percentage of CD4+CD25+Foxp3+LAP+ T cells Tregs was calculated in the pancreatic lymph nodes (PLN). (B) Six-week old NOD mice were treated with OX86 (days 1, 3 and 5; 200 μg/injection). Day 10 post-treatment the percentage of CD4+Foxp3+ Tregs within the CD4+LAP+ and CD4+LAP T cells was calculated in the spleen, pancreatic lymph nodes (PLN) and pancreas.

In addition even if CD4+CD25+Foxp3+LAP+ Tregs expanded upon OX40 antibody treatment (Fig. 5A) only a small proportion of OX40-induced CD4+LAP+ T cells were Foxp3+ (Fig. 5B). In line with these data, previous studies showed that TGFβ-mediated conversion of CD4+CD25 into CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ Tregs induced LAP not only on T cells that converted to Foxp3+ but also on Foxp3 T cells [33].

We next investigated whether CD4+LAP+ T cells generated upon OX40 agonist treatment exhibit suppressive function. We compared the suppressive capacity of OX86 treated or non-treated CD4+LAP+ T cells in co-culture assays using CFSE-labeled CD4+CD25LAP responder T cells. CD4+LAP+ T cells purified from OX86 treated mice resulted in ~50% suppression of responder T cells (Fig. 6). Therefore OX40-specific antibody treatment expands CD4+LAP+ T cells with suppressive ability.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

CD4+LAP+ T cells expanded after OX40 agonist treatment display suppressive activity. CD4+LAP+ T cells were purified from non-treated (NT) or OX40 agonist Ab (OX86) treated NOD mice. Proliferation of responder CD4+CD25 cells (5 × 104) was assessed 72h after stimulation with anti-CD3 Ab (1 μg/ml) and mitomycin C treated T cell-depleted antigen-presenting cells (2 × 105) in the presence or not of CD4+LAP+ cells (5 × 104) from non-treated (NT) or OX86 treated mice. Data are representative of two independent experiments. *, p < 0.05.

2.4. IL-10-expressing insB9-23-specific T cells expand upon anti-OX40/insB9-23 combination treatment

We previously showed that insB9-23 immunization increases IL10-secreting T cells in the NOD mice [16]. We next examined whether OX40 agonist antibody therapy in conjunction with insB9-23 immunization generates IL-10-expressing insB9-23-specific T cells. Although insB9-23 immunizations induced both IL-4- and IL-10-producing insB9-23 reactive CD4+ T cells in the PLN, addition of anti-OX40 agonist antibody promoted the expansion of insB9-23-specific CD4+ T cells expressing IL-10 but not IL-4 (Fig. 7). All together, these data clearly demonstrate that OX40 agonist signal can promote expansion of fully functional adaptive Tregs when combined with antigen-specific immunization.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Anti-OX40/insB9-23 combination treatment expands insB9-23-specific IL-10-producing T cells. The number of insB:9-23-reactive T cells producing IL-4 and IL-10 in the spleen and PLN was enumerated by ELISPOT assay following insB:9-23 in vitro stimulation. In parallel, total IL-4- and IL-10-producing T cells were revealed after anti-CD3 stimulation. ELISPOT was performed using CD8-depleted splenocytes stimulated for 3 days in the presence of 10 μg/ml insB:9-23 or 0.5 μg/ml anti-CD3. The data represent the average ± SEM after subtracting the background (without stimulation). Data are representative of 5 mice per group and two independent experiments.

2.5. Antigen-specific regulatory T cells induced upon anti-OX40/insB9-23 combination treatment can transfer tolerance

To further test the ability of the Tregs induced upon anti-OX40 (OX86)/insB9-23 CT to prevent autoimmune diabetes, we performed adoptive transfer experiments into NOD.SCID mice. Splenocytes from overtly diabetic NOD mice containing diabetogenic cells (Diab) were adoptively transferred alone into NOD.SCID recipient mice or in conjunction with purified CD4+ T cells from NOD mice treated with OX86, insB9-23 (B:9-23) or CT (Fig. 8). NOD.SCID mice receiving diabetogenic cells rapidly developed T1D (within 5–7 weeks post transfer). Co-administration of CD4+ T cells obtained from NOD mice treated with OX86 in combination with insB9-23 peptide (CT) significantly reduced T1D incidence in NOD.SCID recipients. We conclude from these experiments that anti-OX40/insB9-23 CT of prediabetic NOD mice augments the proportion of CD4+ T cells with in vivo suppressive T1D activity.

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

Anti-OX40/insB9-23 combination treatment in prediabetic NOD mice augments the proportion of CD4+ T cells with in vivo suppressive activity. Six-week old NOD mice were treated with (i) OX40 agonist antibody (OX86), (ii) insulin B(9-23) peptide (B:9-23) or (iii) both in combination (CT). Diabetogenic cells (Diab) from fully diabetic NOD mice were injected alone into NOD-SCID recipient mice or co-transferred with CD4+ T cells purified from NOD mice 2 weeks after treatment with OX86, B:9-23 or CT. Autoimmune diabetes development and kinetics were followed in each group (n = 7 or 8 mice per group). *, p < 0.05.

3. Discussion

In vivo and ex vivo-expanded Tregs are currently under clinical evaluation to restore long-term tolerance in type 1 diabetes (T1D) [4,14,3436]. This approach comes however with potential side-effects as Tregs have been shown to be involved in dampening the immune response to tumors and infectious agents. For that reason one has to develop therapeutic strategies enhancing anti-autoimmunity without affecting anti-tumor immunity. One option is to expand antigen-specific aTregs to avoid deleterious effects of transferring large numbers of multi-specific Tregs. However, the agents capable of inducing such an expansion in vivo and currently under clinical evaluations like anti-CD3 or anti-thymoglobulin antibodies are associated with side-effects mainly due to short-term lympho-depletion [9,3741]. Our data here describe a novel approach using a combination of insB9-23 peptide immunization with a non-depleting OX40 agonist antibody to expand islet-specific Treg populations that can prevent autoimmune diabetes.

OX40 has been implicated in several mechanisms controlling the development of effector and memory CD4 T cells as well as the generation and maintenance of memory CD8 T cells (reviewed in [18]). OX40 is expressed on activated CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and consequently can be found at the surface of both Tregs and Teffs. Although anti-OX40 agonist treatment induced long-term tolerance (for at least 30 weeks) by favoring selective expansion of Tregs in our T1D model, and short-term tolerance (for up to 15 days) in another model of autoimmune disease [28], the same anti-OX40 antibody is able to promote anti-tumor immunity by blocking Tregs function in tumor rejection models [18,22]. It is worth noting that treatment with an OX40 agonist antibody did not result in accelerated T1D when injected early in the prediabetic phase of NOD mice. In contrast OX40 agonist therapy slowed down T1D progression (Fig. 1).

Although not formally demonstrated here, the tumor micro-environment may provide a milieu favoring the immunogenic rather than tolerogenic activation status of tumor-infiltrating T cells, thus neutralizing Tregs while activating Teffs through a rescue of tumor-infiltrating dendritic cell (DC) function. This unique ability of OX40 agonist agents to exert differential activities on Tregs depending on the pathologic context will be highly beneficial to avoid potential side-effects, such as lympho-depletion and anti-tumor immunity [42], if used in the clinic to restore tolerance in autoimmune settings.

Mechanistically, both the activation status of Tregs and the cytokine milieu [28] seem to play a key role in this dual effect. Valzasina et al. [20] showed that OX40 triggering does not suppress Tregs function when they are formerly activated in vitro [20] an effect not seen with the glucocorticoid-induced tumor necrosis factor receptor (GITR). Based on our data, one would argue that prediabetic NOD mice display an immune status (both at the cytokine and Treg activation levels) favoring expansion of functional Tregs upon OX40 stimulation. Consistent with this notion we observed a mild but significant increase of insB:9-23-specific CD4+LAP+ T cells in the pancreas of OX86 treated animals (Fig. 4D). As previously observed pancreas-resident antigen-presenting cells (APCs) can capture apoptotic beta-cells and present islet-derived autoantigens (aAgs) to the immune system [43]. Then one can hypothesize that these aAgs-loaded APCs prime and expand insB:9-23-reactive T cells during OX86-mediated expansion of CD4+LAP+ T cells.

One attractive feature of anti-OX40 agonist antibody treatment consists in the fact that both CD4+Foxp3+ and CD4+Foxp3LAP+ T cells were expanded. Proliferation of CD4+Foxp3+ is probably resulting from the expansion of de novo-induced adaptive Tregs from pre-existing natural Tregs as previously described [28]. Indeed in our model, combination of OX86 with insB9-23 peptide immunization resulted in an increased percentage of insB9-23-reactive CD4+Foxp3+ (Fig. 4). In addition the percentage of insB9-23-reactive CD4+LAP+ T cells was also increased in the pancreas and spleen of NOD mice treated with OX86/insB9-23 CT (Fig. 4D). Such a simultaneous expansion of antigen-specific T cells might explain the superior in vivo suppressive capacity observed when total CD4+ T cells from OX86/insB9-23 treated NOD mice are used in an adoptive co-transfer experiment (Fig. 8). In this situation the recipient mice received spleen-derived CD4+ T cells containing a significant number of insB9-23-specific CD4+LAP+ T cells (Fig. 4D) as well as PLN-derived insB9-23-specific CD4+ T cells expressing Foxp3+ (Fig. 1) and/or IL-10 (Fig. 7) known as one of the most potent suppressor cytokine. An important aspect to be addressed in future studies is whether all the different populations generated upon OX86/insB9-23 CT possess equivalent suppressive activity in prediabetic NOD mice.

Several therapeutic settings can be foreseen for the treatment of autoimmunity and transplant rejection. Among them the use of aTregs might be the safest for clinical application. They can be either expanded ex vivo followed by re-implantation into patients or in vivo using antigen vaccination alone or in conjunction with antibodies targeting key receptors to promote synergy [9]. We showed here in vivo that OX40 signals can have a beneficial effect on aTregs to suppress autoimmune diabetes. Our data highlighted that short-term treatment with a non-depleting anti-OX40 agonist antibody expands CD4+ T cells with suppressive activity in prediabetic NOD mice. Since antigen-based immune interventions have been relatively inefficient in humans to prevent autoimmune diabetes [3], the synergy we observed here between anti-OX40 antibody and insB9:23 peptide provides a novel option for efficiently translating antigen-specific treatment into the clinic. Ultimately, a better knowledge of the action of OX40/OX40L pathway on aTregs function might provide new attractive targets to harness these signals and generate more potent Tregs for clinical use.

4. Materials and methods

4.1. Mice

NOD/LtJ mice were purchased from the Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, Maine, USA). Diabetes was defined as two consecutive blood glucose values superior to 250 mg/dl. This study was approved by the La Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology Animal Care Committee.

4.2. Treatments

Six-week old female NOD mice were immunized intranasally with insulin B:9-23 (insB9:23) peptide at 40 μg/immunization (three times a week for the first two weeks; once a week for five more weeks and once every two weeks until the mice reached 25 weeks of age). Some mice also received three intraperitoneal injections (200 μg/injection) of anti-OX40 stimulating antibody (clone OX86; BioXcell, West Lebanon, NH) on days 0, 2 and 4.

4.3. Antibodies and reagents for flow cytometry

We purchased the following antibodies from BD Biosciences: Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated Ki67-specific (B56; cross-reactive with mouse Ki67), PE-conjugated CTLA-4-specific (UC10-4F10-11), PercPCy5.5- and APC-conjugated CD4-specific (RM4-5), FITC-conjugated CD25-specific (7D4), APC-conjugated CD62L-specific (MEL-14), PE-conjugated IFNγ (XMG1.2), FITC-conjugated TNF (MP6-XT22) and CD16/CD32-specific (FcBlock). We purchased the following antibodies from Biolegend: Pacific Blue-conjugated CD25-specific (PC61) and PE-conjugated CD44-specific (IM7). We purchased Pacific Orange-conjugated CD8-specific antibody (Ly-2) and Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated streptavidin from Invitrogen/Life Technologies. We purchased PE-Cy7-conjugated Foxp3-specific antibody (FJK-16S) and the Foxp3 staining buffer set from eBio-science. Biotinylated anti-LAP antibody (BAF246) was purchased from R&D systems (Minneapolis, MN).

4.4. Intracellular cytokine staining (ICCS)

Single-cell suspensions were prepared from intra-pancreatic lymphocytes of age-matched NOD mice either treated with OX86 antibody alone (2 weeks post-treatment) or non-treated. A fraction of the cells were cultured and stimulated in-vitro with a mixture of Phorbol myristate acetate (PMA) at 15 ng/ml and ionomycin at 500 ng/ml for 6 h in presence of Golgi-stop (Cytofix/cytoperm kit, Becton Dickinson) or remained unstimulated as negative controls. Then, cells were stained in FACS buffer (PBS-1X supplemented with 1% FCS)with the conjugated-antibodies specific for cell surface markers (20min at 4 °C). After permeabilisation with the cytofix/cytoperm kit, cells were incubated with a series of cytokine-specific conjugated antibodies (30min at 4 °C) and fixed with a 4% para-formaldehyde solution (15min at room temperature). Cells were washed in FACS buffer, acquired and analyzed on a FACSCalibur or LSRII flow cytometer (BD Biosciences).

4.5. Isolation of pancreas-infiltrated lymphocytes

Freshly collected pancreata were cut into small pieces with a scissor and digested for 30min at 37 °C in 3 ml/pancreas of Hank’s Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS) 1X with Ca2+ and Mg2+ complemented with collagenase P at 2 mg/ml. The digestion is optimized by frequent pipetting using a P1000 pipettor. The digestion was stopped by adding 3 volumes of RPMI-1640 buffer supplemented with 10% FCS (complete RPMI) and the big clumps of undigested pancreas were removed by filtration through a 500 μm mesh. After centrifugation (1,350 rpm, 5min) the cellular pellet was resuspended in a 40% Percoll solution (8 ml/pancreas) and transferred into a 15-ml conical tube. Intra-pancreatic lymphocytes were purified at the interphase of a 40%/75% Percoll density gradient after centrifugation (2,200rpm, 20min at RT). Purified lymphocytes are rapidly washed in complete RPMI and store on ice until further analysis.

4.6. Detection of Ki67+ cells

The staining was performed as previously described [44]. Briefly, single cell suspensions were stained for the surface marker CD4 and subsequently fixed and permeabilized using the Foxp3 staining kit from eBioscience according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Then, Foxp3- and Ki67-specific antibodies (or their isotype controls) were incubated for 30min at 4 °C. After washings the cells were acquired using an LSRII flow cytometer.

4.7. Detection of cytokines and latency-associated peptide (LAP)

IL-4 and IL-10 cytokines were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot assay (ELIspot) as previously described [45]. Briefly, CD4+ T cells were purified by negative magnetic Dynabead® selection (114-16D, Invitrogen/Life Technologies) from the splenocytes or pancreatic lymph nodes (PLN) cells of treated NOD mice (2 weeks after treatment). Serial dilutions of purified (>95% purity) CD4+ T cells (from 104 to 105 cells/well) were resuspended in HL-1 medium (BioWhittaker) in presence of T cell-depleted splenocytes from non-diabetic 6-week old NOD female mice as antigen-presenting cells (APCs) and cultured in 96-well ELISPOT plates (Millipore) coated with anti-IL-4 or anti-IL-10 Abs (mouse ELISPOT antibody pairs, BD Biosciences) for 72 h at 37 °C. Insulin B9-23 peptide or anti-CD3 antibody (clone 145 2C11) were added at a final concentration of 10 or 0.5 μg/ml respectively. Plates were washed, incubated with the appropriate biotinylated anti-mouse cytokine Abs and streptavidin-HRP (P0397, DakoCytomation), and spot forming units developed with 100 mM sodium acetate buffer containing 0.3 mg/ml 3-amino-9-ethylcarbazole (Sigma–Aldrich) and 0.015% hydrogen peroxide. An ImmunoSpot plate reader was used to count spot forming unit per well.

The number of LAP+ T cells were measured as previously described [46]. Briefly, single cell suspensions were incubated with biotinylated anti-LAP polyclonal antibody at 0.25 μg/ml for 1 h at 4 °C. After washing the cells were incubated with AlexaFluor 488-labeled streptavidin at 1/1000 for 20min at 4 °C. The number of LAP+ cells was enumerated by flow cytometry.

4.8. Adoptive cell transfers

To assess the presence and function of regulatory T cells after treatment with OX86 alone insulin B9-23 alone or both in combination, splenocytes and PLN cells were purified from treated animals. Total CD4+ were purified by negative selection (114-16D, Invitrogen/Life Technologies). Six- to eight-week old female NOD-SCID recipient mice were injected intravenously with 3 × 106 diabetogenic cells (splenocytes from overtly diabetic NOD females) alone or a mixture of diabetogenic cells and purified CD4+ T cells (106 cells/mouse) containing putative regulatory T cells.

4.9. Statistical analysis

Data analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism version 4.00. For survival analysis, survival curves were computed using the method of Kaplan–Meier. For other in vivo data the significance of the differences observed between the number diabetic and non-diabetic mice was evaluated using a two-way ANOVA test. Statistical significance for other data was measured using an unpaired two-tailed Mann–Whitney U test. All values of p ≤ 0.05 were considered significant. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01.

Acknowledgments

The authors are would like to thank Kurt Van Gunst and Cheryl Kim for expert cell sorting. We also thank Drs. Daniel Mucida and Hilde Cheroutre for providing us with retinoic acid. This work was supported by NIH Grant U01 (DK78013-04) and the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation (JDRF) grant 4-2005-1168 to M.v.H. and NIH grants CA91837 and AI49453 to M.C.

D.B. is funded by a grant from the JDRF (36-2008-921).

Footnotes

Author contributions

D.B. researched data, contributed to discussion and wrote the manuscript. G.F. researched data and contributed to discussion. Y.M. researched data. M.C. contributed to discussion and reviewed/edited manuscript. M.v.H. contributed to discussion and reviewed/edited manuscript.

References

  • 1.Harjutsalo V, Sjoberg L, Tuomilehto J. Time trends in the incidence of type 1 diabetes in Finnish children: a cohort study. Lancet. 2008;371:1777–82. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60765-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Dahlquist GG, Nystrom L, Patterson CC. Incidence of type 1 diabetes in Sweden among individuals aged 0–34 years, 1983–2007: an analysis of time trends. Diabetes Care. doi: 10.2337/dc11-0056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bresson D, von Herrath M. Immunotherapy for the prevention and treatment of type 1 diabetes: optimizing the path from bench to bedside. Diabetes Care. 2009;32:1753–68. doi: 10.2337/dc09-0373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Luo X, Herold KC, Miller SD. Immunotherapy of type 1 diabetes: where are we and where should we be going? Immunity. 2010;32:488–99. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2010.04.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Peakman M, von Herrath M. Antigen-specific immunotherapy for type 1 diabetes: maximizing the potential. Diabetes. 59:2087–2093. doi: 10.2337/db10-0630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.von Herrath MG. Vaccination to prevent type 1 diabetes. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2002;1:25–8. doi: 10.1586/14760584.1.1.25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.McDevitt H. Specific antigen vaccination to treat autoimmune disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101(Suppl 2):14627–30. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0405235101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Homann D, Dyrberg T, Petersen J, Oldstone MB, von Herrath MG. Insulin in oral immune “tolerance”: a one-amino acid change in the B chain makes the difference. J Immunol. 1999;163:1833–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bresson D, Togher L, Rodrigo E, Chen Y, Bluestone JA, Herold KC, et al. Anti-CD3 and nasal proinsulin combination therapy enhances remission from recent-onset autoimmune diabetes by inducing Tregs. J Clin Invest. 2006;116:1371–81. doi: 10.1172/JCI27191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Homann D, Holz A, Bot A, Coon B, Wolfe T, Petersen J, et al. Autoreactive CD4+ T cells protect from autoimmune diabetes via bystander suppression using the IL-4/Stat6 pathway. Immunity. 1999;11:463–72. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(00)80121-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Tang Q, Adams JY, Tooley AJ, Bi M, Fife BT, Serra P, et al. Visualizing regulatory T cell control of autoimmune responses in non obese diabetic mice. Nat Immunol. 2006;7:83–92. doi: 10.1038/ni1289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Skyler JS, Krischer JP, Wolfsdorf J, Cowie C, Palmer JP, Greenbaum C, et al. Effects of oral insulin in relatives of patients with type 1 diabetes: the Diabetes Prevention Trial–Type 1. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:1068–76. doi: 10.2337/diacare.28.5.1068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ludvigsson J, Faresjo M, Hjorth M, Axelsson S, Cheramy M, Pihl M, et al. GAD treatment and insulin secretion in recent-onset type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:1909–20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0804328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Orban T, Farkas K, Jalahej H, Kis J, Treszl A, Falk B, et al. Autoantigen-specific regulatory T cells induced in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus by insulin B-chain immunotherapy. J Autoimmun. 34:408–415. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2009.10.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Fousteri G, von Herrath M, Bresson D. Mucosal exposure to antigen: cause or cure of type 1 diabetes? Curr Diab Rep. 2007;7:91–8. doi: 10.1007/s11892-007-0017-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Fousteri G, Chan JR, Zheng Y, Whiting C, Dave A, Bresson D, et al. Virtual optimization of nasal insulin therapy predicts immunization frequency to be crucial for diabetes protection. Diabetes. 2010 doi: 10.2337/db10-0561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Bresson D, von Herrath M. Moving towards efficient therapies in type 1 diabetes: to combine or not to combine? Autoimmun Rev. 2007;6:315–22. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2006.09.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Croft M. Control of immunity by the TNFR-related molecule OX40 (CD134) Annu Rev Immunol. 2010;28:57–78. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-030409-101243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kroemer A, Xiao X, Vu MD, Gao W, Minamimura K, Chen M, et al. OX40 controls functionally different T cell subsets and their resistance to depletion therapy. J Immunol. 2007;179:5584–91. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.8.5584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Valzasina B, Guiducci C, Dislich H, Killeen N, Weinberg AD, Colombo MP. Triggering of OX40 (CD134) on CD4(+)CD25+ T cells blocks their inhibitory activity: a novel regulatory role for OX40 and its comparison with GITR. Blood. 2005;105:2845–51. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-07-2959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Vu MD, Xiao X, Gao W, Degauque N, Chen M, Kroemer A, et al. OX40 costimulation turns off Foxp3+ Tregs. Blood. 2007;110:2501–10. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-01-070748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Piconese S, Valzasina B, Colombo MP. OX40 triggering blocks suppression by regulatory T cells and facilitates tumor rejection. J Exp Med. 2008;205:825–39. doi: 10.1084/jem.20071341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Takeda I, Ine S, Killeen N, Ndhlovu LC, Murata K, Satomi S, et al. Distinct roles for the OX40-OX40 ligand interaction in regulatory and nonregulatory T cells. J Immunol. 2004;172:3580–9. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.172.6.3580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Griseri T, Asquith M, Thompson C, Powrie F. OX40 is required for regulatory T cell-mediated control of colitis. J Exp Med. 2010;207:699–709. doi: 10.1084/jem.20091618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Duan W, So T, Croft M. Antagonism of airway tolerance by endotoxin/lipopolysaccharide through promoting OX40L and suppressing antigen-specific Foxp3+ T regulatory cells. J Immunol. 2008;181:8650–9. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.181.12.8650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.So T, Croft M. Cutting edge: OX40 inhibits TGF-beta- and antigen-driven conversion of naive CD4 T cells into CD25+Foxp3+ T cells. J Immunol. 2007;179:1427–30. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.3.1427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Duan W, Mehta AK, Magalhaes JG, Ziegler SF, Dong C, Philpott DJ, et al. Innate signals from Nod2 block respiratory tolerance and program T(H) 2-driven allergic inflammation. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010;126:1284–93. e10. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.09.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ruby CE, Yates MA, Hirschhorn-Cymerman D, Chlebeck P, Wolchok JD, Houghton AN, et al. Cutting edge: OX40 agonists can drive regulatory T cell expansion if the cytokine milieu is right. J Immunol. 2009;183:4853–7. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0901112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ito T, Wang YH, Duramad O, Hanabuchi S, Perng OA, Gilliet M, et al. OX40 ligand shuts down IL-10-producing regulatory T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:13138–43. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0603107103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Harrison LC, Honeyman MC, Steele CE, Stone NL, Sarugeri E, Bonifacio E, et al. Pancreatic beta-cell function and immune responses to insulin after administration of intranasal insulin to humans at risk for type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:2348–55. doi: 10.2337/diacare.27.10.2348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Nanto-Salonen K, Kupila A, Simell S, Siljander H, Salonsaari T, Hekkala A, et al. Nasal insulin to prevent type 1 diabetes in children with HLA genotypes and autoantibodies conferring increased risk of disease: a double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2008 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61309-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Oida T, Zhang X, Goto M, Hachimura S, Totsuka M, Kaminogawa S, et al. CD4+CD25− T cells that express latency-associated peptide on the surface suppress CD4+CD45RBhigh-induced colitis by a TGF-beta-dependent mechanism. J Immunol. 2003;170:2516–22. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.170.5.2516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Oida T, Weiner HL. TGF-beta induces surface LAP expression on murine CD4 T cells independent of Foxp3 induction. PLoS One. 2010;5:e15523. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Fousteri G, Bresson D, von Herrath M. Rational development of antigen-specific therapies for type 1 diabetes. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2007;601:313–9. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-72005-0_34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Masteller EL, Tang Q, Bluestone JA. Antigen-specific regulatory T cells – ex vivo expansion and therapeutic potential. Semin Immunol. 2006;18:103–10. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2006.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Tang Q, Bluestone JA. Regulatory T-cell physiology and application to treat autoimmunity. Immunol Rev. 2006;212:217–37. doi: 10.1111/j.0105-2896.2006.00421.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Chatenoud L, Thervet E, Primo J, Bach JF. Anti-CD3 antibody induces long-term remission of overt autoimmunity in nonobese diabetic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994;91:123–7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.1.123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Herold KC, Gitelman SE, Masharani U, Hagopian W, Bisikirska B, Donaldson D, et al. A single Course of Anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody hOKT3{gamma} 1(Ala-Ala) results in improvement in C-peptide responses and clinical parameters for at least 2 years after onset of type 1 diabetes. Diabetes. 2005;54:1763–9. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.54.6.1763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Keymeulen B, Vandemeulebroucke E, Ziegler AG, Mathieu C, Kaufman L, Hale G, et al. Insulin needs after CD3-antibody therapy in new-onset type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:2598–608. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa043980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Bresson D, von Herrath MG. Anti-thymoglobulin (ATG) treatment does not reverse type 1 diabetes in the acute virally induced rat insulin promoter-lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (RIP-LCMV) model. Clin Exp Immunol. 2011;163:375–80. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2010.04304.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Vendrame F, Pileggi A, Laughlin E, Allende G, Martin-Pagola A, Molano RD, et al. Recurrence of type 1 diabetes after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation, despite immunosuppression, is associated with autoanti-bodies and pathogenic autoreactive CD4 T-cells. Diabetes. 59:947–957. doi: 10.2337/db09-0498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Weinberg AD, Thalhofer C, Morris N, Walker JM, Seiss D, Wong S, et al. Anti-OX40 (CD134) administration to nonhuman primates: immunostimulatory effects and toxicokinetic study. J Immunother. 2006;29:575–85. doi: 10.1097/01.cji.0000211319.00031.fc. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Turley S, Poirot L, Hattori M, Benoist C, Mathis D. Physiological beta cell death triggers priming of self-reactive T cells by dendritic cells in a type-1 diabetes model. J Exp Med. 2003;198:1527–37. doi: 10.1084/jem.20030966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Vukmanovic-Stejic M, Agius E, Booth N, Dunne PJ, Lacy KE, Reed JR, et al. The kinetics of CD4+Foxp3+ T cell accumulation during a human cutaneous antigen-specific memory response in vivo. J Clin Invest. 2008;118:3639–50. doi: 10.1172/JCI35834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Bresson D, Fradkin M, Manenkova Y, Rottembourg D, von Herrath M. Genetic-induced variations in the GAD65 T-cell repertoire governs efficacy of anti-CD3/GAD65 combination therapy in new-onset type 1 diabetes. Mol Ther. 2010;18:307–16. doi: 10.1038/mt.2009.197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Ochi H, Abraham M, Ishikawa H, Frenkel D, Yang K, Basso AS, et al. Oral CD3-specific antibody suppresses autoimmune encephalomyelitis by inducing CD4(+)CD25(−)LAP(+) T cells. Nat Med. 2006;12:627–35. doi: 10.1038/nm1408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES