Skip to main content
. 2013 Oct;26(4):759–780. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00030-13

Table 6.

Essential agreement and error rates for automated antimicrobial test systems versus the CLSI reference broth microdilution methoda

Automated system Organism(s) n (no. NS) % EA % CA % ME % VME Reference
BD Phoenix E. faecalis 39 (4) 82 87 14.2 0 236
E. faecium 46 (22) 98 100 0 0 236
S. aureus 63 (26) 98 100 0 0 236
CoNS 26 (1) 100 100 0 0 236
MicroScan E. faecalis 1311 (0) NR 99.6 0.4 237
E. faecium 362 (0) NR 91.2 8.8 237
Enterococcus 128 (17) 91–94b 88 NR NR 238
S. aureus 161 (0) 97.5 100 0 191
Vitek 2 Enterococcus faecium 30 (3) NR 100 0 239
CoNS 100 (0) 98 99 1 196
S. aureus 270 (20) 80.7 95.4 5.4 10.7 196
S. aureus and S. agalactiae 751 (19) 97.2 96.8 3.0 3.3 240
Staphylococcus 184 (0) 98.2 100 241
a

NS, nonsusceptible; EA, essential agreement; CA, categorical agreement; ME, major error; VME, very major error; NR, not reported; CoNS, coagulase-negative Staphylococcus.

b

Dependent on Prompt or turbidity methods of inoculum preparation.