Skip to main content
. 2013 Oct;57(10):4664–4672. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00723-13

Table 1.

Baseline patients and persistent febrile neutropenia episodes characteristics

Baseline characteristics No. of subjects (%)b
P
DDAT approachc Standard approachd
Patients
PFNa episodes/no. of patients 85/72 1,095/1,095
Sex, male 41 (56.9) 610 (55.7) NSe
Median age (range) 47 (15–75) 50 (16–83) NS
Underlying disease
    Acute myeloblastic leukemia 25 (34.7) 703 (64.2) <0.001
    Acute lymphoblastic leukemia 4 (4.7) 107 (9.8) NS
    Lymphoma 18 (25) 120 (10.9) <0.001
    Others 25 (34.7) 165 (15.1) <0.001
High-risk patients 25 (34.7) 268 (24.4) NS
    Allogeneic HSCT recipients 15 (20.08) 75 (6.8) <0.001
    Relapse of acute leukemia 10 (13.9) 193 (17.6) NS
Neutrophil count <100/mm3, no. (%) 84 (98.8) 806 (73.6) <0.001
First-line antifungal agents, no. (%) 52 (61.2) 1,095 (100) <0.001
    Liposomal amphotericin 4 (2.4) 539 (49.2)
    Caspofungin 24 (28.2) 556 (50.8)
    Voriconazole 23 (27.1)
    Fluconazole 2 (2.4)
    No antifungal therapy 33 (38.8)
Patients that developed IFI 12* 107† NS
a

PFN, persistent febrile neutropenia.

b

Values are presented as the “number of subjects (%)”except as noted otherwise in column 1. *, Eleven were baseline IFI and one was a breakthrough IFI; †, 54 were baseline IFI and the rest were breakthrough IFI.

c

For the DDAT approach, the results of EAT were extrapolated from the study cohort reported by Aguilar-Guisado M et al. (14) in which the hematological patients with PFN were managed according to SAEI guidelines (12).

d

For the standard approach, the results were extrapolated from the randomized trial reported by Walsh et al. (7). In this study, hematological patients with PFN were managed according to IDSA recommendations (4) indicating EAT.

e

NS, not significant.