Table 5.
Strain A a | Strain B a | Route of Inoculation | Organ | Median CI b | Number of Mice | P value c |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
amiA amiC sufI | WT | i.p. | spleen | 0.016 | 5 | 0.0029 |
amiA amiC sufI tatC | amiA amiC sufI | i.p. | spleen | 0.26 | 9 | 0.036 |
oral | spleen | 0.32 | 9 | 0.033 | ||
small intestine | 1.30 | 9 | NS | |||
amiA amiC sufI +amiA+ | WT | i.p. | spleen | 1.49 | 8 | NS |
amiA amiC sufI +amiC+ | WT | i.p. | spleen | 0.36 | 8 | 0.034 |
amiA amiC sufI +sufI+ | WT | i.p. | spleen | 0.47 | 8 | NS |
+amiA+ | WT | i.p. | spleen | 1.09 | 5 | NS |
+amiC+ | WT | i.p. | spleen | 1.02 | 10 | NS |
+sufI+ | WT | i.p. | spleen | 0.96 | 5 | NS |
The strains used were 14028, JS2019, JS2020, JS2034, JS2035, JS2036, JS2031, JS2032, and JS2033 for i.p. infections, and JS2019 and JS2020 for oral infections.
The competitive index (CI) was calculated as described in the experimental procedures.
The student’s t test was used to compare the output and the inoculums.