Skip to main content
. 2013 Oct 24;8(10):e78690. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078690

Table 4. Direct and Mediated Effects per 100 000 person-years of Educational Level on Breast Cancer for each Mediator derived from Multinominal Logistic Regression Parameter Estimates and the Additive Hazards Model, Copenhagen, Denmark, 1981-2001.

Potential mediatorsa Educational level Direct effectb (additional cases per 100 000 py) 95% CI Mediated effectb (additional cases per 100 000 py) 95% CI Mediated proportion 95% CI
BMI Low -> Medium 66 24, 108 0 -4, 4 0% -7%, 6%
Low -> High 65 13, 118 1 -6, 8 1% -24%, 14%
Alcohol consumption Low -> Medium 59 16, 101 10 5, 15 15% -1%, 28%
Low -> High 55 3, 107 19 11, 27 26% 14%, 69%
Parity Low -> Medium 61 19, 103 10 6, 14 14% 8%, 36%
Low -> High 60 9, 111 14 8, 19 19% 10%, 45%
Age at first birthc Low -> Medium 54 7, 102 7 1, 14 12% 0%, 21%
Low -> High 39 -20, 99 19 4, 33 32% 10%, 257%
HT used Low -> Medium 67 24, 110 5 4, 6 7% 4%, 19%
Low -> High 63 8, 119 7 6, 8 10% 6%, 18%

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; HT, hormone therapy; PY, person-years.

a In categories of: BMI <25 kg/m2, 25-29.9 kg/m2, and 30+ kg/m2; Alcohol <1, 1-7, and >7 drinks/week; Physical activity <2 hours of light physical activity; 2-4 hours of light physical activity, and >4 hours of light activity/> 2 hours of vigorous activity per week; Parity 0, 1, 2, 3+; Age at first birth <25, 25-29, 30+ yrs, and nulliparous. HT use ‘yes’ vs. ‘no’.

b Adjusted for age and study.

c Excluding participants with missing information on age at first birth, N=3475.

d Excluding participants with missing information on HT use, N=2641.