Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2013 Jul 2;38(11):10.1016/j.psyneuen.2013.06.011. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2013.06.011

Table 1.

Correlations between ethanol intake variables, BEC and CORT. Analyses encompass all FT intervals examined. The correlation coefficient (r), level of significance (P) and sample size (n) are reported for each relationship. Significant correlations are bolded

5E ml 5E licks BEC CORT
B6 mice
5E g/kg r = 1.00; P < 0.001
n = 50
r = 0.85; P < 0.001
n = 50
r = 0.77; P < 0.001
n = 36
r = 0.00; P = 1.00
n = 47
5E ml --- r = 0.87; P < 0.001
n = 50
r = 0.75; P < 0.001
n = 36
r = −0.02; P = 0.90
n = 47
5E licks --- --- r = 0.70; P < 0.001
n = 36
r = 0.00; P = 0.98
n = 47
BEC --- --- --- r = 0.31; P = 0.07
n = 35

D2 mice
5E g/kg r = 1.00; P < 0.001
n = 60
r = 0.89; P < 0.001
n = 60
r = 0.77; P < 0.001
n = 59
r = 0.04; P = 0.76
n = 59
5E ml --- r = 0.91; P < 0.001
n = 60
r = 0.75; P < 0.001
n = 59
r = 0.01; P = 0.97
n = 59
5E licks --- --- r = 0.69; P < 0.001
n = 59
r = −0.17; P = 0.19
n = 59
BEC --- --- --- r = 0.14; P = 0.30
n = 58