Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Bone Miner Res. 2014 Jan;29(1):10.1002/jbmr.2005. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2005

Table 2.

Baseline bone cross-sectional geometry, overall and by study arm: mean ± standard deviation relative to mean in normative sample.

Parameter* All p DHEA + COC
Arm
Placebo Arm p
Femoral Shaft
n 73 40 33
Bone mineral density 95 ± 11 0.0001 96 ± 9 94 ± 13 0.58
Cross-sectional area 104 ± 13 0.005 106 ± 11 103 ± 15 0.26
Cortical thickness 51 ± 7 <0.0001 51 ± 6 50 ± 7 0.65
Inner diameter 146 ± 14 <0.0001 147 ± 14 144 ± 14 0.44
Outer diameter 110 ± 7 <0.0001 111 ± 7 109 ± 7 0.25
Buckling ratio 222 ± 38 <0.0001 221 ± 33 223 ± 44 0.84
Section modulus 114 ± 17 <0.0001 116 ± 16 110 ± 17 0.10
Bone strength index § 114 ± 17 <0.0001 117 ± 16 110 ± 17 0.10

Femoral Narrow Neck
n 76 42 34
Bone mineral density 92 ± 12 <0.0001 92 ± 12 93 ± 12 0.71
Cross-sectional area 95 ± 14 0.002 96 ± 14 93 ± 13 0.41
Cortical thickness 102 ± 17 0.25 102 ± 17 102 ± 16 0.92
Inner diameter 104 ± 9 0.0002 106 ± 8 102 ± 10 0.030
Outer diameter 102 ± 7 0.005 104 ± 7 100 ± 8 0.030
Buckling ratio 103 ± 20 0.17 106 ± 21 100 ± 18 0.21
Section modulus 90 ± 17 <0.0001 91 ± 18 88 ± 16 0.41
Bone strength index § 90 ± 17 <0.0001 92 ± 18 88 ± 16 0.41
*

Bone strength parameters are expressed as percentage of normal mean for age, height, and lean body mass, determined from an independent sample. Baseline DXA not available for 1 DHEA+COC subject and 2 placebo subjects.

Comparing mean to 100% of normal, by one-sample t-test.

Comparing mean between treatment groups, by independent-sample t-test.

§

1000 × section modulus ÷ height.