Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Nov 15.
Published in final edited form as: J Mol Biol. 2013 May 4;425(22):10.1016/j.jmb.2013.04.027. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2013.04.027

Table 3.

The RMSD between the Average MAS NMR Structure and Various X-ray and Solution NMR Structures of CAP-Gly.a

Backbone,
Åb 		Heavy
atoms, Åb 		Backbone vs.
1TXQ, Å		 Backbone vs.
2COYc, Å		 Backbone vs.
2HKQ, Å		 Backbone vs.
2HQH, Å		 Backbone vs.
3E2U, Å
All residues 0.54 ± 0.12 1.14 ± 0.10 1.66 1.79 1.68 1.70 1.71
Residues in secondary structure 0.25 ± 0.05 0.96 ± 0.12 0.58 0.70 0.60 0.56 0.60
a

Note that X-ray and solution NMR structures represent systems different from CAP-Gly under investigation: X-ray structures are those of complexes of CAP-Gly and their binding partners EB1 and ZnCLIP while solution NMR structure is of different CAP-Gly contruct.

b

Fit of the ensemble of the 10 lowest energy structures to the average structure.

c

This is a solution NMR structure of CAP-Gly deposited in the Protein Data Bank (but not yet published).