Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. 2011 Summer;10(3):505–510.

Table 3.

Effect of EPG on solid tumor volume

Design of treatment	Solid tumor volume ( mL)
Design of treatment	15 ^th day	20 ^th day		25 ^th day	30 ^th day
Tumor control	3.99 ± 0.23	4.63 ± 0.26	5.13 ± 0.41		6.62 ± 0.38
EPG (100 mg/Kg, p.o)	2.56 ± 0.28^*	3.09 ± 0.51^*	3.13 ± 0.68^*		4.26 ± 0.18^*
EPG (200 mg/Kg, p.o)	2.13 ± 0.21^*	3.58 ± 0.16^*	3.86 ± 0.21^*		4.21 ± 0.1^*
EPG (400 mg/Kg, p.o)	2.27 ± 0.37^*	3.27 ± 0.37^*	3.66 ± 0.19^*		4.17 ± 0.21^*

N = 6 animals in each group. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM.

^*p < 0.001when compared with control. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test.