Skip to main content
. 2012 Summer;11(3):733–745.

Table 4.

Data of clinical score and macroscopic evaluation of colitis in control and treatment groups after 7 days treatment

Groups A B C *+ D * E F G H I
ΔBW(g) 28.3 ± 1.6 -34 ± 5.0 11.5 ± 2.4*+ 3.5 ± 2.7 4.2 ± 2.8 -20 ± 3.2 -5 ± 5.1 17.8 ± 1.7 9 ± 6.9
Cw /Bw (mg/g) 2.5 ± 0.7 12.9 ± 0.7 6.6 ± 0.9*+ 9.1 ± 0.2 8.4 ± 0.2 10.7 ± 0.9 5.5 ± 0.3* 4.7 ± 0.4* 3.6 ± 0.6*
Ulcerative area (%) 0.0 ± 0.0 69.7 ± 5.3 28.6 ± 3.5*+ 50.2 ± 4.1 51.8 ± 3.7 71.8 ± 3.9 40 ± 7.8* 24 ± 6.5* 13.1 ± 0.9*
Macroscopic score 0.0 ± 0.0 3.0 ± 0.0 2.4 ± 0.3 2.7 ± 0.2 2.7 ± 0.3 2.8 ± 0.4 2.7 ± 0.2 2.1 ± 0.4 2.0 ± 0.08

ΔBW = Body Weight change; Cw/Bw = Colon weight to body weight ratio; Ulcerative area (%) = Ulceration area /Total area of 8 cm colon; A = Normal group; B = Colitis group; C = Budesonide pectin-coated pellets (300 μg/Kg/day); D = Budesonide solution (300 μg/Kg/day); E = Budesonide uncoated pellets (300 μg/Kg/day); F = Placebo pellets; G = Mesalazine enema (400 mg/Kg/day, rectally); H = Budesonide enema (20 mcg/Kg/day, rectally); I = Prednisolone (5 mg/Kg/day, oral).

The results were expressed as mean ± SEM, (n = 6).*p < 0.05, denote significant difference vs. colitis control group; +p < 0.05 denote significant difference vs. budesonide solution, budesonide uncoated pellets.