Skip to main content
. 2013 Nov;132(5):e1384–e1394. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-0755

TABLE 2.

Benefits of CARRA-CoRe Compared With Traditional Product-Specific Registries

Characteristics of Consolidated Disease-Based Safety Registries Benefits
Broad inclusion criteria allowing enrollment of all patients with specific diseases into a single registry Larger sample sizes
Inclusion of comparator groups
More closely represents the target population
Improved ability to detect serious and/or rare adverse events
Systematic, active surveillance of adverse events and outcomes
No competition for patients as occurs with multiple single-product registries
Long-term retention of patients in registry as medication usage, age, and geographic location change
Insight into how medications are actually used in the target population by practitioners
Consolidated safety registry infrastructure, standardized data entry and management, policies, procedures Decreased variability in data entry, improving quality while limiting monitoring and data cleaning burden, and improving regulatory compliance
Leverage existing rapid start agreements with sites, site performance training and regulatory processes, improving efficiency of study start-up and conduct
Allows multiple concurrent safety surveillance projects for different products
Long-term follow-up into adulthood improves assessment of events with long latency times
Collaborative study design includes industry input while assuring scientific independence
Standard of care outpatient visits and diagnostic studies decreases the registry’s cost per patient
Ability to perform multiple concurrent projects of interest to stakeholders: investigators, industry partners, funding agencies, and patients
Comprehensive and cohesive scientific oversight platform for design and data analysis Scientifically sound and efficient approach to meet post-marketing requirements and commitments for registries
Improved assessment of the risk/benefit ratio of treatment options for patients, families, and providers
Ability to compare multiple exposed and unexposed groups to more accurately analyze the strength of the association of adverse events to products
Improved ability to understand contribution of disease course and severity to adverse events and outcomes
Ability to incorporate patient- and family-centered goals and patient-reported outcomes
Engagement of patients and families in design and governance of the consolidated safety registry Patients, families, and clinicians have input into the evaluation of the risk/benefit ratio of treatment options
Improved patient and family trust in immunomodulatory products and the pharmaceutical industry owing to transparent governance and scientific oversight