Broad inclusion criteria allowing enrollment of all patients with specific diseases into a single registry |
Larger sample sizes |
Inclusion of comparator groups |
More closely represents the target population |
Improved ability to detect serious and/or rare adverse events |
Systematic, active surveillance of adverse events and outcomes |
No competition for patients as occurs with multiple single-product registries |
Long-term retention of patients in registry as medication usage, age, and geographic location change |
Insight into how medications are actually used in the target population by practitioners |
Consolidated safety registry infrastructure, standardized data entry and management, policies, procedures |
Decreased variability in data entry, improving quality while limiting monitoring and data cleaning burden, and improving regulatory compliance |
Leverage existing rapid start agreements with sites, site performance training and regulatory processes, improving efficiency of study start-up and conduct |
Allows multiple concurrent safety surveillance projects for different products |
Long-term follow-up into adulthood improves assessment of events with long latency times |
Collaborative study design includes industry input while assuring scientific independence |
Standard of care outpatient visits and diagnostic studies decreases the registry’s cost per patient |
Ability to perform multiple concurrent projects of interest to stakeholders: investigators, industry partners, funding agencies, and patients |
Comprehensive and cohesive scientific oversight platform for design and data analysis |
Scientifically sound and efficient approach to meet post-marketing requirements and commitments for registries |
Improved assessment of the risk/benefit ratio of treatment options for patients, families, and providers |
Ability to compare multiple exposed and unexposed groups to more accurately analyze the strength of the association of adverse events to products |
Improved ability to understand contribution of disease course and severity to adverse events and outcomes |
Ability to incorporate patient- and family-centered goals and patient-reported outcomes |
Engagement of patients and families in design and governance of the consolidated safety registry |
Patients, families, and clinicians have input into the evaluation of the risk/benefit ratio of treatment options |
Improved patient and family trust in immunomodulatory products and the pharmaceutical industry owing to transparent governance and scientific oversight |