Skip to main content
. 2013 Oct 30;8(10):e79163. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079163

Figure 7. Modification of rotation angle Inline graphic by colour contrast modulation.

Figure 7

(A) Histogram of rotational angle for different colour contrast modulations. Upper and lower panels: rotation angle histogram (n = 117 cells, from one of four experiments) for 24% red and 12% blue contrast stimuli (red bars) and for 12% red and 24% blue contrast stimuli (blue bars). Second and forth panels: high colour contrast is lowered to 21%, while low colour contrast is changed to 14% (n = 109). Middle panel: 83 ganglion cells are excited by red blue stimuli with equal colour contrasts (18%). (B) Upper panel: summary of results from Figure 4A. The angle Inline graphic was averaged along the ganglion cell population as a function of colour contrast modulation: Inline graphic (Inline graphic - contrast blue, Inline graphic - contrast red). Error bars show standard error. Lower panel: average Inline graphic (red) and Inline graphic (blue). Here, Inline graphic and Inline graphic represent red and blue colour channel weightings, respectively, since 1D nonlinearity is a function of Inline graphic. Error bars represent standard error. (C) Rotation angle Inline graphic measured at high blue contrast plotted as a function of angle Inline graphic measured at high red contrast for all analyzed cells for 24% and 12% contrast (upper panel) and for 21% and 14% contrast (lower panel). It appears that there is a positive correlation between Inline graphic measured at high blue contrast and Inline graphic measured at high red contrast.