Skip to main content
. 2013 Oct 30;8(10):e77836. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077836

Table 1. Food Animal Sources of Salmonella Recovered at Federally Inspected Slaughter and Processing Facilities in the Northeastern U.S.1 with Human Isolates Shown for Reference.

Year No. Chickens Tested No. (%) Chickens Positive for Salmonella No. Cattle Tested No. (%) Cattle Positive for Salmonella No. Turkeys Tested No. (%)TurkeysPositive forSalmonella No. Swine Tested No. (%) Swine Positive for Salmonella Total No. Samples Inspected Total No. (%) Positive for Salmonella No. Human Salmonella Received No. 20 Most Common Human Salmonella
2005 1714 315 (18.4) 9,754 102 (1.0) 175 39 (22.3) 2,191 61 (2.8) 13,834 517 (3.7) 1,537 549
2006 1,947 271 (13.9) 8,449 117 (1.4) 730 74 (10.1) 2,346 78 (3.3) 13,472 540 (4.0) 1,686 749
2007 1,684 172 (10.2) 6,539 76 (1.2) 709 49 (6.9) 1,643 27 (1.6) 10,575 324 (3.1) 1,829 706
2008 1,002 103 (10.3) 6,241 90 (1.4) 276 43 (15.6) 1,342 26 (1.9) 8,861 262 (3.0) 1,680 645
2009 989 95 (9.6) 4,005 19 (0.5) 376 29 (7.7) 1,099 13 (1.2) 6,469 156 (2.4) 1,706 662
2010 1,254 146 (11.6) 3,099 29 (0.9) 573 38 (6.6) 1,137 24 (2.1) 6,063 237 (3.9) 1,749 716
2011 1,071 92 (8.6) 4,281 39 (0.9) 375 10 (2.7) 654 10 (1.5) 6,381 151 (2.4) 1,778 695
TOTAL 9,661 1,194 (12.4) 42,368 472 (1.1) 3,214 282 (8.8) 10,412 239 (2.3) 65,655 2,187 (3.3) 11,967 4722
1

Pennsylvania, Maine, Vermont, New Hampshire, New York, Maryland, Connecticut, Rhode Island, Massachusetts, Delaware, New Jersey, Indiana, Ohio, Michigan and Washington, DC.