Skip to main content
. 2013 Oct 30;8(10):e77775. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077775

Table 4. Comparison between travellers and field data for the pfcrt 76 and pfdhfr 108 molecular markers and for the CQ in vitro susceptibility in Senegal.

Country Travellers Slope [95% CI*] Field Study Slope [95% CI] p-value**
Pfcrt 76 Senegal −0.167 [−0.219; −0.115] −0.208 [−0.312; −0.105] 0.575
Mali −0.009 [−0.082; 0.063] 0.005 [−0.106; 0.116] 0.885
Cote d’Ivoire −0.146 [−0.215; −0.078] −0.215 [−0.463; 0.032] 0.578
Cameroon −0.090 [−0.146; −0.033] 0.050 [−0.220; 0.321] 0.264
Pfdhfr 108 Senegal 0.117 [0.088; 0.147] 0.148 [0.088; 0.209] 0.386
Mali 0.182 [0.124; 0.240] 0.119 [0.086; 0.152] 0.116
Cote d’Ivoire 0.083 [0.052; 0.113] 0.132 [−0.025; 0.289] 0.484
Cameroon 0.213 [0.115; 0.311] 0.130 [−0.155; 0.415] 0.753
CQ in vitro analysis Senegal −0.050 [−0.085; −0.015] −0.028 [−0.059; 0.002] 0.264
*

CI = confidence interval,

**

The p-value indicates whether the fitted slopes for travellers data and field studies were significantly different from each other.