Table 2.
Comparisons | Odds ratio | 95% confidence interval | P value | Heterogeneity | Effects model | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I 2 | P value | |||||
A versus G | 1.010 | 0.628–1.622 | 0.969 | 90.5% | 0.000 | Random |
Asians | 1.221 | 0.647–2.304 | 0.538 | 91.7% | 0.000 | |
Caucasians | 0.754 | 0.589–0.967 | 0.026 | 0.0% | 0.989 | |
AA versus GG | 0.976 | 0.368–2.592 | 0.961 | 90.2% | 0.000 | Random |
Asians | 1.475 | 0.407–5.345 | 0.554 | 90.7% | 0.000 | |
Caucasians | 0.524 | 0.317–0.865 | 0.011 | 0.0% | 0.968 | |
GA versus GG | 0.811 | 0.460–1.429 | 0.469 | 77.6% | 0.001 | Random |
Asians | 1.236 | 0.791–1.913 | 0.353 | 42.6% | 0.175 | |
Caucasians | 0.467 | 0.299–0.730 | 0.001 | 0.0% | 0.730 | |
GA + AA versus GG | 0.856 | 0.430–1.707 | 0.660 | 86.6% | 0.000 | Random |
Asians | 1.277 | 0.631–2.584 | 0.497 | 78.4% | 0.010 | |
Caucasians | 0.487 | 0.319–0.741 | 0.001 | 0.0% | 0.804 |