Skip to main content
. 2013 Aug 13;41(20):9218–9229. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt718

Table 3.

Predicted T4 effectors in various genomes of α- and γ-proteobacteria

Genome ORFa Known T4Es (%)b Predicted T4Es (%)c Predicted TP (%)d Mean GC (%)e High GC (%)f Low GC (%)g GDRs (%)h IB (%)i GSRs (%)j
Ehrlichia ruminantium, strain Gardel 950 NA 22 (2,32) NA 28 68 32 23 36 41
Anaplasma marginale 963 4 (0,42) 26 (2,70) 100 50 62 38 15 46 38
Brucella abortus chr I 2000 3 (0,15) 53 (2,65) 100 57 62 38 25 40 34
Brucella abortus chr II 1034 1 (0,10) 17 (1,64) 100 57 41 59 6 65 29
Coxiella burnetii 2085 43 (2,06) 126 (6,04) 77 43 50 50 15 41 44
Coxiella burnetii pl 36 1 (2,78) 4 (11,11) 100 39 50 50 25 25 50
Legionella pneumophila 2943 275 (9,34) 311 (10,57) 81 38 40 60 8 40 53

aNumber of ORFs in the genome.

bNumber and proportion of known T4 effectors in the genome.

cNumber and proportion of predicted T4 effectors.

dProportion of true positives in S4TE prediction.

eMean G + C content of the genome.

fProportion of predicted T4 effectors in genomic regions with high G + C content.

gProportion of predicted T4 effectors in genomic regions with low G + C content.

hProportion of predicted T4 effectors in gene-dense regions.

iProportion of predicted T4 effectors in ‘in between’ regions.

jProportion of predicted T4 effectors in gene-sparse regions.

NA, not applicable; TP, true positives; GDRs, gene dense regions; GSRs, gene sparse regions; T4Es, type IV effectors.