Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep 1;13(9):1–60.
Table 1: Body of Evidence Examined According to Study Design
Table A1: Study Design Characteristics
Table A2: Patient Characteristics
Table A3: Intervention Characteristics
Table A4: Meta-Analysis and Univariate Sensitivity Analyses for Comparison of Self-Management to Usual Care Across Various Outcomes
Table A5: GRADE Evidence Profile for Comparison of Self-Management and Usual Care (Health Status Outcomes)
Table A6: GRADE Evidence Profile for Comparison of Self-Management and Usual Care (Health Status Outcomes, Health-Related Quality of Life)
Table A7: GRADE Evidence Profile for Comparison of Self-Management and Usual Care (Healthy Behaviour Outcomes)
Table A8: GRADE Evidence Profile for Comparison of Self-Management and Usual Care (Self-Efficacy)
Table A9: GRADE Evidence Profile for Comparison of Self-Management and Usual Care (Health Care Utilization Outcomes)
Table A10: Risk of Bias Among Randomized Controlled Trials for the Comparison of Self-Management and Usual Care