Skip to main content
. 2013 Oct 31;8(10):e79366. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079366

Table 1. ANCOVA for the specific growth rate of Lymnaea stagnalis snails during the experiment.

Source df MS F η2 (%) p
Feeding treatment (F) 1 0.063 498.195 32.8 < 0.001
Infection status of focal individual (IF) 2 0.006 49.357 6.5 < 0.001
Infection status of competitor (IC) 2 0.001 5.210 0.7 0.006
Size 1 0.061 484.366 31.9 < 0.001
F×IF 2 0.000 1.985 0.3 0.139
F×IC 2 0.000 1.897 0.2 0.151
IF×IC 4 0.000 0.832 0.2 0.505
F×IF×IC 4 0.000 0.145 0.0 0.965
Error 415 0.000

Factors are feeding treatment [ad libitum food supply, reduced food supply (i.e. half of the average food consumption)], infection status of focal individual (unexposed, exposed but unparasitized, exposed and parasitized; parasite: Diplostomum pseudospathaceum) and infection status of competitor (unexposed, exposed but unparasitized, exposed and parasitized; parasite: D. pseudospathaceum). Snail size (ln of geometric mean of initial and final size) was used as a covariate. η2 shows the proportion of total variance explained by each factor.