Table 1. ANCOVA for the specific growth rate of Lymnaea stagnalis snails during the experiment.
Source | df | MS | F | η2 (%) | p |
Feeding treatment (F) | 1 | 0.063 | 498.195 | 32.8 | < 0.001 |
Infection status of focal individual (IF) | 2 | 0.006 | 49.357 | 6.5 | < 0.001 |
Infection status of competitor (IC) | 2 | 0.001 | 5.210 | 0.7 | 0.006 |
Size | 1 | 0.061 | 484.366 | 31.9 | < 0.001 |
F×IF | 2 | 0.000 | 1.985 | 0.3 | 0.139 |
F×IC | 2 | 0.000 | 1.897 | 0.2 | 0.151 |
IF×IC | 4 | 0.000 | 0.832 | 0.2 | 0.505 |
F×IF×IC | 4 | 0.000 | 0.145 | 0.0 | 0.965 |
Error | 415 | 0.000 |
Factors are feeding treatment [ad libitum food supply, reduced food supply (i.e. half of the average food consumption)], infection status of focal individual (unexposed, exposed but unparasitized, exposed and parasitized; parasite: Diplostomum pseudospathaceum) and infection status of competitor (unexposed, exposed but unparasitized, exposed and parasitized; parasite: D. pseudospathaceum). Snail size (ln of geometric mean of initial and final size) was used as a covariate. η2 shows the proportion of total variance explained by each factor.