Skip to main content
. 2013 Oct 4;18(Suppl 1):82–102. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2013.829538

Table 5.

Health literacy practices for health professionals: Consensus group ratings (N = 23)

Item Source example Very appropriate or appropriate (%) Very important or important (%) Round accepted
The individual…
P1 … consistently elicits the full list of patient concerns at the outset of encounters. Osborne, 2005 89.5 79.0 1
P2 … consistently negotiates a mutual agenda with patients at the outset of encounters. Osborne, 2005 94.7 89.4 1
P3 … routinely recommends the use of professional medical interpreter services for patients whose preferred language is other than English. Andrulis & Brach, 2007 94.7 94.8 1
P4 … consistently speaks slowly and clearly with patients. Weiss, 2007 100 94.7 1
P5 … routinely uses verbal and non-verbal active listening techniques when speaking with patients. Osborne, 2005 100 94.7 1
P6 When preparing to educate patients, routinely asks about patients' preferred learning style in a non-shaming manner (e.g., asks, “What is the best way for you to learn new information?”). The Joint Commission, 2007 72.7 71.4 2
P7 … routinely elicits patients' prior understanding of their health issues in a non-shaming manner (e.g., asks, “What do you already know about high blood pressure?”). Doak et al., 1996 89.5 79.0 1
P8 … routinely puts information into context by using subject headings in both written and oral communication with patients. AMA Foundation, 2007 90.9 86.3 2
P9 … routinely uses short action-oriented statements, which focus on answering the patient's question, “what do I need to do” in oral and written communication with patients. Oates & Paasche-Orlow, 2009 94.5 70.5 1
P10 … routinely emphasizes one to three “need-to-know” or “need-to-do” concepts during a given patient encounter. Sheridan et at, 2011 88.3 82.4 1
P11 … routinely uses analogies and examples, avoiding idioms and metaphors, to help make oral and written information more meaningful to patients. Doak et al., 1996 86.3 76.2 2
P12 … routinely selects culturally and socially appropriate and relevant visual aids, including objects and models, to enhance and reinforce oral and written communication with patients. Doak et al., 1996 94.5 94.4 1
P13 … routinely makes instructions interactive, such that patients engage the information, to facilitate retention and recall. Doak et al., 1996 88.8 88.9 1
P14 … consistently avoids using medical jargon in oral and written communication with patients, and defines unavoidable jargon in lay terms.* Weiss, 2007 94.8 100 1
P15 … consistently follows principles of easy-to-read formatting when writing for patients, including the use of short sentences and paragraphs, and the use of bulleted lists rather than denser blocks of text, when appropriate. CMS, 2013 89.5 84.3 1
P16 … routinely writes in English at approximately the 5th–6th-grade reading level. AMA Foundation, 2007 88.9 78.9 1
P17 … consistently writes or re-writes (“translates”) unambiguous medication instructions when called for during regular duties. Sheridan et at, 2011 88.9 83.4 1
P18 … routinely conveys numeric information, such as risk, using low numeracy approaches, such as through examples, in oral and written communication.* Osborne, 2005 89.4 78.9 1
P19 … consistently uses a universal precautions approach to oral and written communication with patients.* DeWalt et al., 2010 83.3 83.3 1
P20 … routinely conducts medication reconciliation with patients, including use of “brown bag” medication reviews, when called for during regular duties. AMA Foundation, 2007 84.2 73.7 1
P21 … routinely encourages and facilitates patients to carry an updated list of their medications with them. The Joint Commission, 2007 100 94.5 1
P22 … routinely assesses adherence to treatment recommendations, and root causes for non-adherence, non-judgmentally, before recommending changes to treatment plans. AMA Foundation, 2007 100 94.7 1
P23 … consistently elicits questions from patients through a “patient-centered” approach (e.g., “What questions do you have?” rather than “Do you have any questions?” Oates & Paasche-Orlow, 2009 94.7 84.2 1
P24 … routinely anticipates and addresses navigational barriers within health care systems and shares responsibility with patients for understanding and navigating systems and processes; attempts to make systems and processes as transparent as possible. Rudd & Anderson, 2006 83.3 84.2 1
P25 … routinely ensures that patients understand at minimum: 1) what their main problem is, 2) what is recommended that they do about it, and 3) why this is important. National Patient Safety Foundation, 2010 100 89.5 1
P26 … consistently locates and uses literacy-appropriate patient education materials, when needed and available, to reinforce oral communication, and reviews such materials with patients, underlining or highlighting key information. Berkman et al., 2004 88.9 94.5 1
P27 … routinely “chunks and checks” by giving patients small amounts of information and checking for understanding before moving to new information. AMA Foundation, 2007 89.5 84.2 1
P28 … routinely uses a teach back or “show me” technique to check for understanding and correct misunderstandings in a variety of health care settings, including during the informed consent process.* Schillinger et al., 2003; The Joint Commission, 2007 100 94.4 1
P29 … consistently treats the diagnosis of limited health literacy as “protected health information” requiring specific “release of information” for disclosure. Consensus group participants 72.7 72.7 2
P30 … routinely arranges for timely follow-up when communication errors are anticipated. Weiss, 2007 83.3 72.3 1
P31 … routinely refers patients to appropriate community resources for enhancing literacy and/or health literacy skills (e.g., Adult Basic Literacy Education) within the context of the therapeutic relationship. AMA Foundation, 2007 77.8 72.2 1
P32 … routinely documents in the medical record that a teach back, or closed communication looptechnique has been used to check the patient's level of understanding at the end of the encounter.* Weiss, 2007 91.5 86.4 3
Practice item that did not achieve consensus after four rounds
The graduate …
Px … consistently limits the use of words with three or more syllables in oral and written communication. AMA Foundation, 2007 59.1 54.5 No consensus

Note. Twenty-three panelists participated in Round 1; 22 panelists participated in subsequent rounds.

*

See Appendix.