Skip to main content
. 2013 Nov 1;8(11):e79129. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079129

Table 3. Study of the variability and hydrophobicity of the different CT regions of HIV-2.

Region (CT aa positions) Average SE Average mixture of aa per position Kyte-Doolittle scale score average Average variation per position per alignment** Average SE provius alignment/ virus alignment*
CT (1 to 165) 0.618 0.570 -0.295 0.511 0.229/0.200
A (0 to 20) 0.253 0.15 -0.616 0.250 0.121/0.068
B (21 to 47) 0.898 1.11 -1.813 0.889 0.360/0.283
B group A* 0.278 ND ND ND ND
B group B* 0.193 ND ND ND ND
C (48 to 68) 0.504 0.428 1.190 0.333 0.192/0.152
D (69 to 91) 0.807 0.957 0.023 0.479 0.232/0.252
E (92 to 125) 0.565 0.324 -0.195 0.441 0.189/0.208
F (126 to 136) 0.691 0.364 -0.495 0.272 0.292/0.216
G (137 to 165) 0.592 0.517 -0.032 0.724 0.228/0.191
G start (137 to 150) 0.968 1.071 0.216 1.286 0.360/0.312
G end (151 to 165) 0.242 0.067 -0.382 0.200 0.105/0.079

A: the first conserved region containing the endocytosis signal. B: the region containing the Kennedy-like sequences. C: the hydrophobic region D: LLP-2 domain. E: LLP-3 domain. F: LLP-3 / LLP-1 inter-region. G: LLP-1 region. ND: not determined. * Group A, B, provirus, virus alignement SE were normalized with the natural logarithm of the number of sequences. ** Results of the intra-patient study.