Skip to main content
. 2011 Jul 6;4(4):523–532. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7915.2011.00253.x

Table 3.

Molecular identification of endophytic strains and risk group classification.a

Strain Bacterial species and accession numberb Phylum Risk groupc
BT18 Bacillus subtilis HQ667318 Firmicutes 1
CAR2 Enterobacter agglomerans HQ667319 γ‐Proteobacteria 2
HC2 Rahnella aquatilis HQ667320 γ‐Proteobacteria 1
HC8 Bacillus subtilis HM441224 Firmicutes 1
ML15 Bacillus cereus HQ667321 Firmicutes 2
ML16 Enterobacter agglomerans HQ667322 γ‐Proteobacteria 2
MZ3 Bacillus subtilis HQ667323 Firmicutes 1
MZ4 Acinetobacter baumannii HQ667324 γ‐Proteobacteria 1
PT19 Serratia sp. HQ667325 γ‐Proteobacteria 1
PT20 Enterobacter amnigenus HQ667326 γ‐Proteobacteria 2
TM1 Enterobacter agglomerans HQ667327 γ‐Proteobacteria 2
TM2 Kocuria sp. HQ667328 Actinobacteria 2
a.

Based on comparison of their 16S rDNA sequences with those in the GenBank database sharing at least 99% homology.

b.

All sequences have been submitted to GenBank. Sequences were obtained by sequencing the 5′ end using primer 27 fm for HC8 and the 3′ end using primer R1522 for all other strains. Sequences are between 600 and 800 bp long.

c.

Risk group 1 includes bacteria that are safe to be applied in the field; risk group 2 includes potential human and plant pathogens.