Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Semin Orthod. 2013 Sep;19(3):10.1053/j.sodo.2013.03.002. doi: 10.1053/j.sodo.2013.03.002

Figure 3.

Figure 3

UNC Class II RCT data for the percentages of children with types of outcomes. It is true that phase 1 treatment produced a significantly different outcome from the controls—but equally true and more important that the chance of a favorable outcome was about 75% for both functional appliance and headgear treatment, and the chance of a highly favorable outcome (the result usually presented in case reports) was much lower.