Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Genet Couns. 2012 Aug 11;22(2):10.1007/s10897-012-9532-8. doi: 10.1007/s10897-012-9532-8

Table 5.

Criteria Used to Decide Relevancy for Return of Results for Rare Variants in DCM Genetic Research

Established
DCM
Gene
Novel
DCM
Gene
Variant previously published as disease causing x NAa
Rare x x
Nucleotide and/or amino acid conserved across species x x
Type of variant (.e.g, nonsynonymous, nonsense,
splice site, etc)
x x
Familial segregation x x
Multiple rare variants associated with disease, ideally
segregating in more than one family
x
Relevant functional data xb x
Histological evidence of key protein/protein disruption
in human tissue specimens
x
a

NA is not applicable.

b

The availability of functional data for specific variants identified in established DCM genes adds to certainty, especially for novel variants in sporadic disease, as discerning pathologic versus neutral variants can be challenging without evidence of segregation.