Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Urol. 2012 Oct 18;188(6):10.1016/j.juro.2012.07.099. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.07.099

Table II.

Study population demographic and tumor characteristics following propensity adjustment

Characteristic Partial
Nephrectomy
Radical
Nephrectomy
P
Value
Tumor size (cm) 2.8±0.8 2.8±0.9 0.534
Charlson Co-Morbidity Index 0.87±1.2 0.89±1.3 0.491
Gender
  Male 1,551 (56.7) 1,551 (56.1) 0.34
  Female 1,183 (43.3) 1,211 (43.9)
Race/Ethnicity 0.401
  Caucasian 2,308 (84.4) 2,356 (85.3)
  African American 256 (9.4) 237 (8.6)
  Asian 51 (1.9) 50 (1.8)
  Hispanic 62 (2.3) 61 (2.2)
  Other 58 (2.1) 58 (2.1)
Marriage Status 0.258
  Not married 1,004 (36.7) 1,033 (37.4)
  Married 1,730.5 (63.6) 1,728.5 (62.6)
Area of residence 0.433
  Non-metropolitan 416 (15.2) 409 (14.8)
  Metropolitan 2,318 (84.8) 2,352.7 (85.2)
Histologic Type 0.220
  Clear cell 2,256 (82.5) 2,286 (82.7)
  Papillary 327 (12.0) 322 (11.6)
  Chromophobe* <150 (<6%) <150 (<6%)
  Adenocarcinoma <11 <11
Grade 0.27
  1 520 (19.0) 498 (18.0)
  2 1,146 (41.9) 1,161 (42.1)
  3 339 (12.4) 343 (12.4)
  4 39 (1.4) 37 (1.4)
  missing 690 (25.2) 721.5 (26.1)
SEER Region 0.7219
  San Francisco 79 (2.9) 86 (3.1)
  Connecticut 214 (7.8) 210 (7.6)
  Detroit 261 (9.6) 270 (9.8)
  Hawaii* <40 (<2%) <40 (<2%)
  Iowa 211 (7.7) 215 (7.8)
  New Mexico 52 (1.9) 53 (1.9)
  Seattle 151 (5.5) 154 (5.6)
  Utah 56 (2.1) 57 (2.1)
  Atlanta 58 (2.1) 60 (2.2)
  San Jose 59 (2.2) 53 (1.9)
  Los Angeles 257 (9.4) 255 (9.2)
  Rural Georgia <11 <11
  Greater California 366 (13.4) 380 (13.8)
  Kentucky 275 (10.1) 255 (9.3)
  Louisiana 208 (7.6) 208 (7.5)
  New Jersey 450 (16.5) 463 (16.8)
Socioeconomic Status
  Median household income per tract for zip code ($) 49,996±21,379.5 50,111.0±21,234.0 0.674
  Percent residents per tract living below poverty level 8.8±11.4 8.7±11.1 0.392
  Percent of persons 25+ per tract with <12 years education 18.7±12.0 18.5±11.8 0.402

To protect patient confidentiality, results with 11 patients or less are reported as N<11 and percentages in the respective columns were rounded in increments of 1%. To avoid derivation of the omitted cells, totals from the next smallest group (*) from each covariate category were similarly altered.