Skip to main content
. 2010 Jun 24;3(4):412–427. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7915.2009.00160.x

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Effects on reporter performance of several manipulations of the promoter region of a sulA′::lux construct in E. coli. Data represent the increase in bioluminescence (in relative light units) following a 60 min exposure to different nalidixic acid concentrations. (□) wild‐type; (◆) a mutation near the lexA binding site; (Inline graphic) a tandem sulA‐recA promoter; (●) a modification of the −35 consensus sequence; (Inline graphic) a promoter‐containing fragment extending into the sulA ORF. Activity is reported as the difference in luminescence intensity (in arbitrary relative light units, RLU) between the induced and non‐induced reactions.