Skip to main content
. 2013 Oct 8;2013:295153. doi: 10.1155/2013/295153

Table 3.

Summary of results.

Outcome or subgroup Studies Participants Odds ratio (95% confidence interval)
Is albumin useful in paracentesis?
1.1.1 Death 2 173 1.36 (0.61, 3.04)
1.1.2 Encephalopathy 1 35 3.36 (0.13, 88.39)
1.1.3 Hyponatraemia 3 210 0.47 (0.13, 1.66)
1.1.4 Paracentesis-induced circulatory dysfunction 1 72 0.26 (0.08, 0.93)
1.1.5 Readmission 1 101 0.51 (0.22, 1.18)
1.1.6 Renal impairment 3 208 0.51 (0.13, 1.98)

Is albumin better than other volume expander in paracentesis?
1.2.1 Death 5 556 0.63 (0.38, 1.03)
1.2.2 Encephalopathy 6 574 0.87 (0.42, 1.80)
1.2.3 Hyponatraemia 7 602 0.70 (0.44, 1.12)
1.2.4 Gastrointestinal bleeding 5 520 0.90 (0.35, 2.31)
1.2.5 Readmission 5 412 0.83 (0.56, 1.24)
1.2.6 Renal impairment 5 475 1.09 (0.51, 2.34)
1.2.7 Sepsis/severe infection 3 189 0.74 (0.21, 2.62)

Is albumin useful in infections overall?
1.3.1 Death 4 388 0.46 (0.25, 0.86)
1.3.2 Hyponatraemia 1 40 2.00 (0.32, 12.41)
1.3.3 Infection resolution 2 236 4.30 (0.89, 20.70)
1.3.4 Renal impairment 5 498 0.34 (0.15, 0.75)

Is albumin useful in spontaneous bacterial peritonitis?
1.4.1 Death 3 278 0.39 (0.18, 0.84)
1.4.2 Infection resolution 1 126 4.20 (0.46, 38.71)
1.4.3 Renal impairment 3 278 0.32 (0.10, 1.04)

Is albumin useful in non-spontaneous bacterial peritonitis infections?
1.5.1 Death 1 110 0.73 (0.27, 2.02)
1.5.2 Infection resolution 1 110 4.40 (0.48, 40.70)
1.5.3 Renal impairment 1 110 0.23 (0.02, 2.10)