Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Nov 4.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Hematol. 2010 Feb;85(2):10.1002/ajh.21585. doi: 10.1002/ajh.21585

Table 3.

Genetic (rG), and environmental (rE) correlations between serum iron measures in families with HFE C282Y/C282Y probands

Proband Measure 1* Measure 2* Model N (Individuals) rG Correlation (Standard error) P (ρG = 0) P (ρG = 1) rE Correlation (Standard error) P (ρE = 0)
C282Y/C282Y TS Ln SF C 664 0.726 (0.114) 5.4×10−6 0.0038 0.344 (0.059) <1×10−6
D 596 0.759 (0.148). 0.00028 0.049 0.370 (0.065) 3.1×10−6

TS UIBC C 664 −0.945 (0.033) <1×10−6 0.035 −0.864 (0.019) <1×10−6
D 596 −0.955 (0.054) 6.7×10−6 0.21 −0.869 (0.020) <1×10−6

Ln SF UIBC C 664 −0.614 (0.102) 0.000011 1.1×10−6 −0.462 (0.058) <1×10−6
D 596 −0.544 (0.133) 0.0015 5.1×10−6 −0.504 (0.065) <1×10−6
*

Model covariates: Model C (age, gender, age × gender, HFE genotype); Model D (age, gender, age × gender, HFE genotype, Field Center, body mass index, menopausal status, phlebotomy treatment, hepatitis, decile of alcohol intake, C-reactive protein); C282Y-H63D genotypes were coded as five indicator variables in all models. Field Centers were coded as four indicator variables in all models.

P values for two-sided tests of the genetic correlation between serum iron measures, ρG = 0 vs. ρG ≠ 0, and ρG = 1 vs. ρG ≠ 1.

P values for two-sided tests of the environmental correlation between serum iron measures, ρE = 0 vs. ρE ≠ 0.