Skip to main content
. 2013 Oct 25;13:439. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-439

Table 2.

Comparison of knowledge scores between public and private physicians in urban Pakistan

Knowledge
Public
Private
p-value
  n = 100 (%) n = 96 (%)  
Diagnosis of CAT 1 patients
Good
20 (20.0)
19 (20.0)
0.559
Fair
47 (47.0)
52 (54.0)
Poor
33 (33.0)
25 (26.0)
Management of CAT 1 patients
Good
35 (35.0)
46 (48.0)
0.160
Fair
41 (41.0)
28 (29.0)
Poor
24 (24.0)
22 (23.0)
Counseling of patients
Good
59 (59.0)
56 (58.0)
0.495
Poor
41 (41.0)
40 (42.0)
Contact screening
Good
54 (54.0)
41 (43.0)
0.044*
Poor
46 (46.0)
55 (57.0)
Diagnosis of CAT-2 patients
Good
18 (18.0)
10 (10.5)
0.298
Fair
30 (30.0)
35 (36.5)
Poor
52 (52.0)
51 (53.0)
Management of CAT-2 patients
Good
38 (38.0)
20 (21.0)
0.028*
Fair
30 (30.0)
33 (34.0)
Poor 32 (32.0) 43 (45.0)  

*p-value <0.05 was considered as significant.

Knowledge scores regarding diagnosis and management of TB patient: Good (≥75%), Fair (50.1-74.99%) and Poor (≤50).

Knowledge scores regarding counseling and contact screening of TB patient: Good (≥50%) and Poor (<50%).

CAT 1: Includes new cases of smear positive pulmonary tuberculosis or smear negative pulmonary tuberculosis with extensive parenchymal involvement or seriously ill extra pulmonary tuberculosis.

CAT 2: Includes previous treatment for more than four weeks in the past, and is found sputum smear positive pulmonary tuberculosis. This category includes: relapse, failure, treatment after default, and others (with smear positive).