Table 2. Associations between types of physical activity and T2DM risk.
No. of diabetescases | HR* | 95%CI | HR** | 95%CI | |
Total METs | |||||
Q1 (<4.3) | 307 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
Q2 (4.3–<6.5) | 272 | 0.84 | 0.72–0.99 | 0.92 | 0.78–1.08 |
Q3 (6.5–<8.9) | 242 | 0.72 | 0.61–0.85 | 0.80 | 0.68–0.95 |
Q4 (8.9–<12.1) | 233 | 0.66 | 0.55–0.78 | 0.74 | 0.62–0.88 |
Q5 (≥12.1) | 250 | 0.65 | 0.54–0.77 | 0.73 | 0.61–0.87 |
P trend<0.0001 | P trend<0.0001 | ||||
LPA participation | |||||
None | 876 | 1.00 | |||
Yes | 428 | 0.85 | 0.75–0.96 | 0.86 | 0.76–0.98 |
LPA METs | |||||
None | 876 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
Low (<1.2) | 117 | 0.79 | 0.65–0.96 | 0.80 | 0.65–0.97 |
Medium (1.2–3.0) | 137 | 0.87 | 0.72–1.04 | 0.89 | 0.74–1.07 |
High (≥3.0) | 174 | 0.89 | 0.75–1.07 | 0.91 | 0.76–1.08 |
P trend = 0.0763 | P trend = 0.1195 | ||||
DPA METs | |||||
Q1 (<3.3) | 296 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
Q2 (3.3–<5.03) | 253 | 0.83 | 0.70–0.98 | 0.88 | 0.74–1.04 |
Q3 (5.03–<7.0) | 257 | 0.82 | 0.69–0.97 | 0.88 | 0.74–1.04 |
Q4 (7.0–<9.8) | 251 | 0.77 | 0.65–0.91 | 0.85 | 0.72–1.01 |
Q5 (≥9.8) | 247 | 0.69 | 0.58–0.83 | 0.75 | 0.63–0.90 |
P trend <0.0001 | P trend = 0.0033 | ||||
CPA METs *** | |||||
Low (<1.1) | 427 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
Medium (1.1–2.67) | 219 | 0.86 | 0.73–1.01 | 0.93 | 0.79–1.10 |
High (≥2.67) | 161 | 0.66 | 0.55–0.79 | 0.74 | 0.62–0.89 |
P trend <0.0001 | P trend = 0.0022 |
Model 1: Adjusted for age at interview, energy intake, smoking, alcohol consumption, education level, occupation, income level, hypertension, and family history of diabetes.
Model 2: As above plus BMI and WHR.
Analysis restricted to employed participants.