Table 5.
Ghosting |
Median-Patients |
Median-Volunteers |
No loss in diagnostic value |
Non-diagnostic/low diagnostic value |
||||
Reader 1 | Reader 2 | Reader 1 | Reader 2 | Patients | Volunteers | Patients | Volunteers | |
non-dpTX 3.0T | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1.5 | 44% | 80% | 56% | 20% |
dpTX 3.0T | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 98% | 100% | 2% | 0% |
1.5T | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
The left half of the table depicts mean values as rated by the two radiologists based on the 3-point ordinal scale in which “3” = no ghosting, “2” = ghosting not interfering with diagnostic image interpretation, “1” = severe ghosting interfering with diagnostic interpretation. The right half of the table illustrates the percentage of images deemed to have “No loss in diagnostic value” (scored as ≥ 2) vs “Non-diagnositc/Low Diagnostic Value” (scored as 1). Numbers in bold are statistically different from the other two numbers within the column.