Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep 28;5(9):334–344. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v5.i9.334

Table 5.

Ghosting artifact: Median values and percent of diagnostic studies

Ghosting Median-Patients
Median-Volunteers
No loss in diagnostic value
Non-diagnostic/low diagnostic value
Reader 1 Reader 2 Reader 1 Reader 2 Patients Volunteers Patients Volunteers
non-dpTX 3.0T 1 1 2 1.5 44% 80% 56% 20%
dpTX 3.0T 2 2 2 2 98% 100% 2% 0%
1.5T 2 2 2 2 100% 100% 0% 0%

The left half of the table depicts mean values as rated by the two radiologists based on the 3-point ordinal scale in which “3” = no ghosting, “2” = ghosting not interfering with diagnostic image interpretation, “1” = severe ghosting interfering with diagnostic interpretation. The right half of the table illustrates the percentage of images deemed to have “No loss in diagnostic value” (scored as ≥ 2) vs “Non-diagnositc/Low Diagnostic Value” (scored as 1). Numbers in bold are statistically different from the other two numbers within the column.