Table 2.
Candidate regions selected based on QTL data and allele frequency differences between the lines inferred from SNP chip genotyping and FSV computation from resequencing. The selected percentages of the QTL regions significant with model B, are given (Besnier et al., 2011).
| Region name | Start Mbp1 | End Mbp | Size (Mbp) | QTL support2 | Ensembl genes3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C1G1 | 169.6 | 175.0 | 5.4 | 5.4 | 97 |
| C2G2 | 59.7 | 65.4 | 5.7 | 2.1 | 52 |
| C3G4 | 24.1 | 35.8 | 11.7 | 10.3 | 142 |
| C4G6 | 10.6 | 12.9 | 2.3 | 0.0 | 62 |
| C5G8 | 34.2 | 36.8. | 2.6 | 0.0 | 20 |
| C5G8 | 38.2 | 39.0 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 16 |
| C7G9 | 20.4 | 35.4 | 15.0 | 4.3 | 209 |
| C20G12 | 8.3 | 9.5 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 38 |
| Total | 44.7 | 23.3 | 636 |
1
Coordinates based on the Chicken (Gallus gallus) assembly v 2.1/galGal3;
2
Size of the selected regions significant with QTL model B (Besnier et al., 2011);
3
Number of Ensembl genes in the initial list in the selected regions